|
|
I neither watched nor listened to the Trump-vs-Clinton TV
debate (being that I sensed that irresponsible and
confrontationally-combative feminist-sexist Clinton was
available for the debate regardless of previous-or-ongoing
health issues or whatever)...the two reasons being:
Song of Solomon 2:14 = Oh my dove, in the clefts
of the rock, in the covert of the cliff, let me see YOUR face,
let me hear YOUR voice, because YOUR voice is sweet, and YOUR
face is attractive. (Hillary is not "my dove" whether or not
her tersely-harsh blattering voice is "sweet" or her old,
wrinkled, coughing face is "attractive").
First Timothy 2:11 = Have a woman learn in silence
with all subjection.
12 I allow no woman to teach nor to have authority over men;
she is to keep silent.
13 because Adam was formed first, then Eve;
14 and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and
became a transgressor.
Satan's accomplices delight in thumbing their libelous nose
and uplifting their slanderous 3rd finger pertaining to the
verses above by pushing for and promoting the disgraceful
and despicable sight of a woman on stage debating Trump
vying for the Presidency.
If Hillary gets elected in November of 2016, it will be
up-to-four-years of certainly not prefacing her name with
the word "president" but rather referring to her as:
"Maddamn Clinton."
Scurrilous pro-Hillary, bigoted-bias-bytes propaganda
shills have incessantly been and relentlessly are
detestfully reminiscent of colorless black-and-white
blatterings of Nazi pseudo-journalists in Germany
during the 30s and 40s.
According to a number of pro-Hillary-for-woman-President
propaganda sources (such as HuffPost, Politico, Newsmax,
and even Breitbart), giddy SillyHilly has reveled
in her debate-against-Donald jollies, as some japs might
have done concerning their assault on Pearl Harbor, but
to which one of their military commanders, hearing about
the successful devastation inflicted by that efficient
surprise-attack invasion, is said to have responded:
"I'm afraid that all we have done is to awaken a
sleeping giant, and fill him with a terrible
resolve."
Should Trump debate inferior-gender feminist-twit
Hillary again, participating in possible or probable
flagrant publicly-disdained disregard against
Ecclesiastes 7:26-28, Isaiah 3:12, Nahum 3:13, First
Corinthians 14:33-38, First Timothy 2:11-15 and
First Peter 3:7?
ONLY IF the Lord Jesus Christ convinces Trump to do
that, and then Trump obeys such convincing as an
authentic and genuine Presbyterian Christian.
Holy Scripture (both Old and New Testaments)
essentially define "sexists" as insubordinate
inferior gender (and their [sometimes pro-homosexual]
male patsies) who selfishly, inconsiderately,
arrogantly, dishonestly, adversarially, and
demonically crave women obtaining and exercising
authority and predominance (or at least "equality")
over and against men.
I and the wife attended Mac Hammond's Living Word
Church Friday evening (26 August 2016) in Brooklyn
Park MN to listen to and watch the entertaining and
quasi-edifying
talking/shouting/stepping antics of Bible-verses-quoting
preacher/teacher diet/feeding/exercise-conscious Kenneth
Copeland, protege of Oral Roberts, and spiritual advisor
to famous military-and-commercial aircraft pilot and
aviation businessman James (Mac) Hammond.
Before ending the service with alleged "mass healings,"
Kenneth did OK generally, except for one flagrantly-gross
doctrinal-inaccuracy error: He stated (in so many words)
that Jesus was at least temporarily or momentarily
tortured in "Hell" upon His death by crucifixion.
'Pastor' Copeland is not the only one with whom that
aberrant heresy is associated.
The infamous "Apostle's Creed" wrongly states that:
"...He descended into Hell."
But in fact, Christ Jesus ascended into Paradise the
same day that He (not the Father in Heaven) actually
and physically died, after His disembodied soul
descended into Sheol (the abode of the dead) - NOT
Hell NOR Hades - or as it states in Scripture:
Ephesians 4:8 Therefore it is said: "When He
ascended on high He led a host of captives, and He
gave gifts to humans."
9 In saying: "He ascended," what does it mean
but that He had also descended into the lower parts
of the earth?
10 He who descended is He who also ascended
far above all the heavens, that He might fill all
things.
...as David also descended into such (lower-parts
Sheol) when he died, except that, in David's case,
David's body "saw corruption" whereas the body of
The Holy One did NOT experience corruption and was
NOT "abandoned" to Hades:
Acts 2:22 "Men of Israel, hear these words:
Jesus of Nazareth, a Man attested to you by God
with mighty works and wonders and signs which God
did through Him among you, as you yourselves
know--
23 this Jesus, delivered up according to
the definite plan and foreknowledge of God, you
crucified and killed by the hands of lawless men.
24 But God raised Him up, having loosed
the pangs of death, because it was not possible
for Him to be held by it.
25 For David says regarding Him: 'I saw
the Lord always before me, for he is at my right
hand that I may not be shaken;
26 therefore my heart was glad, and my
tongue rejoiced; moreover my flesh will live in
hope.
27 because you will not abandon my soul
to Hades, nor let your Holy One see corruption.
' "
29 "Brethren, I may say to you confidently
of the patriarch David that he both died and was
buried, and his tomb is with us to this day.
30 Being therefore a prophet, and knowing
that God had sworn with an oath to him that He
would set one of his descendants upon his throne,
31 he foresaw and spoke of the
resurrection of the Christ, that He was not
abandoned to Hades, nor did His flesh see
corruption.
32 This Jesus God raised up, and of that
we all are witnesses.
33 Being therefore exalted at the right
hand of God, and having received from the Father
the promise of the Holy Spirit, He has poured out
this which you see and hear.
34 For David did not ascend into the
heavens; but he himself says: 'The Lord said to
my Lord, Sit at my right hand,
35 until I make your enemies a stool for
your feet.'
36 Let all the house of Israel therefore
know assuredly that God has made Him both Lord
and Christ, this Jesus whom you crucified."
Acts 13:34 And as for the fact that He
raised Him from the dead, no more to return to
corruption, He spoke in this way: 'I will give
you the holy and sure blessings of David.'
35 Therefore he says also in another psalm:
'You will not let your Holy One see corruption.'
36 Because David, after he had served the
counsel of God in his own generation, fell asleep,
and was laid with his fathers, and saw corruption;
37 but He whom God raised up saw no
corruption.
The immutable "great chasm" between Hades and
Paradise mentioned in the New Testament prevented
and prevents anyone (including Jesus, the Son of
God) from being transported or transporting
themselves from one to the other (as irrevocably
established by God the Father):
Luke 16:22 The poor man died and was
carried by the angels to Abraham's bosom. The
rich man also died and was buried;
23 and in Hades, being in torment, he
lifted up his eyes, and saw Abraham far off and
Lazarus in his bosom.
24 And he called out: "Father Abraham,
have mercy upon me, and send Lazarus to dip the
end of his finger in water and cool my tongue;
for I am in anguish in this flame."
25 But Abraham said: "Son, remember that
you in your lifetime received your good things,
and Lazarus in like manner evil things; but now
he is comforted here, and you are in anguish.
26 And besides all this, between us and
you a Great Chasm has been Fixed, in order that
those who would pass from here to you may not
be able, and none may cross from there to us."
Neither Jesus nor the Penitent Thief on a cross
were even momentarily transported to Hades nor
temporarily suffered torture therein the instant
both of them died nor shortly thereafter (and
obviously there is no
repent-within-and-suffer-a-while-to-escape
Purgatory):
David reminded us that even if he went to Sheol
(the abode of the righteous and the wicked dead),
God would be present (whether invoked or not
invoked), but Dave did NOT say the same about
if he were to be in that compartment of Sheol
called Hades:
Psalm 139:7 Where will I go from your
Spirit? Or where shall I flee from your
presence?
Psalm 139:8 If I ascend to heaven,
you are there! If I make my bed in Sheol, you
are there!
Admittedly, the Almighty is omnipresent (which
includes Hades) but is non-accessible to
sentient beings in Hades, which situation is
similar to God both never looking upon evil:
Habakkuk 1:13 You who are of purer
eyes than to view and consider evil and cannot
look on wrong, why do you look at faithless
men, and are silent when the wicked swallows
up a man more righteous than he?
...yet seeing both the good and the evil
simultaneously:
Proverbs 15:3 The eyes of the LORD
are in every place, keeping watch on the
evil and the good.
Neither the exact words of The Nicene
Creed (with its needlessly-repeated
word "begotten" and its lack of stating
that Jesus died but instead merely stating
that He "suffered and was buried")...NOR
the exact words of The Apostle's
Creed (stating that those of the Holy
Christian Church are "baptized for the
remission of sins" when instead sins of
the redeemed are ONLY "remitted" [i.e.
guilt and penalty of or for such
lamentably-committed-under-non-solicited-duress-temptation
sins are atoned for resulting in justification and
salvation of the saints] by Christ's bloody death
on a cross, which is THE ONLY thing that cancels
requirement for a penitent sinner to be eternally
damned for everlasting punishment, IF such sinner
believes that gospel [rather than sins remitted
by mere baptism of whatever body parts in
whatever amount of water or ingesting
eucharistic-tidbit appetizers "often" or at least
once in a while]...are found anywhere
within the entirety of the Old-and-New-Testaments
Holy Bible.
The Penitent Dying Thief on his cross was neither
baptized nor communionized with eucharist
immediately prior to nor promptly after his death
by crucifixion, yet (according to the promise of
Jesus), made it into Paradise that same day he
died.
One thing that the thief did do (like the Penitent
Woman Caught in Adultery and various recorded
recipients of Christ's healing power) was verbal
acknowledgement to Jesus being "Lord" (something
those possessed by demons never did) and by that
profession of faith expressed complete submission
to the authority of Christ as God.
-------------------------------------------
In the latest issue of its English-language magazine Dabiq,
the Islamic State calls on Christians to abandon Christianity,
arguing that Jesus himself was “a slave of Allah” who will
“wage jihad” upon returning to earth.
Well, quasi-deluded participants in ISIS, ISIL, Daesh,
whatever, be it known that GENUINE-and-non-"infidel"
Christians (not apocrypha-adhering maryolatrous
pseudo-"christian" catholics nor Christ-as-Messiah-rejecting
synagogue-of-Satan "jews") in the alleged land of "Shirk"
are certainly NOT going to abandon AUTHENTIC
Old-and-New-Testament-Holy-Bible TRUE Christianity (which
fact should assuredly be made known to you all in Dabiq
and elsewhere through the Amaq news agency and your Al-Hayat
Media Center).
Such bonafide saints of Jesus the Christ and Messiah (a
slave of, yet one with and as part of, Father/Son/Spirit
YHWH and not "allah") have no reason nor intention to do
a Hijrah pilgrimage to Mecca nor Khilafah but look forward
to the Almighty Christ eventually landing physically on
Jerusalem after battling victoriously at the plain of
Megiddo in Israel (i.e. Armageddon) and not Dabiq in northern
Syria. Please carefully study
http://endtimeprophecy.faithweb.com for more details, and
believe Divine prophecies therein instead of concocting
your own fallacious revisionist variations.
Some pompous-ass members of the U.S. military and
Hillary-scandals-disregarding media obviously have
brown-nosed (i.e. suckholed to) the islamic veteran-ness
of the now-dead-from-Iraq-battle son Capt Khan of Mr and
Mrs Khizr and Ghazala Khan (the latter pictured in
islamic headdress veil) who were DNC speakers and both
have been and probably-still-are supporters of Hillary
and her presidential campaign.
Mrs. Khan's statement that "women are equal to men" in the
United States and Mr. Khan's that "[peaceful?] Islam is the
solution" for all of America's problems" is partly what has
caused the reactionary Twitter comments from Trump.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/
articles/2016/08/02/
captain-khan-s-brigade-commander-in-iraq-the-khan-family-is-our-family.html
CNN, Reuters, NBC, CBS, Politico, Huffpost, Newsmax, SRN, and
other media big names should ask more Trump supporters rather
than non-admittedly-pre-selected Clinton supporters for their
questionable polls with deceptively-skewed "polling
results."
The female burka-and-hijab modesty of fundamentalist-muslim
women, and their espousal of anti-LGBTQ patriarchy instead
of feminist sexism, is of course to be significantly if not
greatly admired and lauded -- in stark contrast to the
especially-during-warm-weather quasi-indecent-exposure
decadent hedonism of even so-called "evangelical christians"
[a.k.a. heretic apostates] who excuse their
noxiously-lewd-and-obscene sin with their deviant assertion
that "they are no longer subject to Mosaic Law but instead
saved by grace through faith in Christ."
ISIS understandably (and thankfully) angrily takes (at
least in some ways) a blessed literal approach to
Torah-Law-and-other-Biblical morality commands of decency
and dress, though lamentably mixed with anti-Scriptural
hostility, excess, and misrepresentation of certain
other aspects of true Christianity and Christians and
their Holy Bible.
But everyone (Western and non-Western) should remember
that the English word "LORD" is what one associates with
the Hebrew word for Almighty God (i.e. YHWH, Adonai,
Elohim), the Trinitarian-Godhead Creator, who has
arbitrarily and always chosen Israel (of the lineage not
merely of Abram and Sarai who faithlessly produced
Ishmael with the help of the Egyptian Hagar) of
faith-believers Abraham and Sarah, followed by
also-faith-believing Isaac and Jacob (renamed Israel by
the Lord after successfully wrestling with the
theophany-type preappearance of Jesus in the form of a
man-angel, as was the case with the Fourth-Person theophany
in the fiery furnace of Nebuchadnezzar).
It is understood that a majority of such "chosen-people" of
Israel do NOT belong to Israel but are instead a "synagogue
of Satan" and, like their non-jew American, European, ISIS,
non-ISIS comrades, are "on the broad and easy road to
destruction" instead of on "the narrow and hard road to
life" and consequently will forever burn suspended within
the permanent confines of outer darkness while eternally
tortured by the invisible flames of the Lake of Fire, all
of which has been prophetically predicted in the Christian
Holy Bible.
========================================================
Counter-balancing the disgusting and erotically-titillating
loose-long-haired mopheadedness, naked-armed sleeveslessness
(thanks a lot, ambitious-newscasteress and supertwit Megyn
Kelly!), and shortened-skirted nude bareleggedness exhibited
on stage at the 2016 GOP Convention, Trump recently tried
to compensate and in doing so also kind of adversely
affected the LGBTQ cause and previous supportive statements
Trump made concerning them]:
PC Website had the following news item:
Donald Trump has pledged to crack down on Internet pornography
via corporate partnerships and possibly establishing a federal
commission on the harmful effects of pornography, a nonprofit
said Monday.
While it appears to be coincidental, Trump’s pledge comes a
day after the New York Post’s Sunday edition included a
full-page nude photo of Melania Trump, his wife, on its
cover.
Enough is Enough, a nonprofit dedicated to confronting
online pornography, child pornography, child stalking and
sexual predation, published Trump’s signed pledge on Monday.
Trump’s opponent Hillary Clinton refused to sign the pledge,
Enough is Enough said.
At this point, neither Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton
nor Libertarian Party nominee Gary Johnson has signed the
pledge.
Undeniable proof that Trump is supposedly a woman-hating
misogynist (as the HuffPost editor reviles him as) is
quite evident by his supportive posed-for-porn wife and
daughters-in-law voluntariy standing beside him in non-feigned
sincere appreciation and admiration on stage at the RNC --
in stark contrast to the real misogyny imposed by
anti-Trumpite Clintonistas who advocate the abortion-homicide
"rights" of choice to murder helpless female infants in
wombs from which such innocents should instead be safely
evacuated during childbirth.
No wonder the God of Justice in Heaven above has allowed
and continues to allow righteously-vengeful ISIS judgment
to punish such american-and-european
pro-feminists/homosexuals/abortionists/evolutionist
"crusaders" for the Devil.
=======================================================
Only the brain-dead do not perceive that the vain attempt
by demonic media and associated conspirators to violate God's
obvious patriarchal human-authority-structure intentions
(e.g. Leviticus 27:1-5, Ecclesiastes 7:26-28, Isaiah 3:12,
Nahum 3:13, First Corinthians 11:1-16 and 14:33-38, First
Timothy 2:11-15, First Peter 3:7) by campaigning for
Hillary to become President is arrogant thumbing-their-nose
and uplifted-third-finger satanically-chauvinistic
exhibitionism.
Noteworthy it will be to watch (and experience) the Lord's
retaliatory response against them and theirs.
Genuine Christians and their patriarchy-espousing Bible
verses are NOT "misogynous" woman-haters....they just
despise feminist-sexist, notoriously-non-qualified,
scandals-laden, national-security-irresponsible Hillarians
who want bitchwitch antagonists to have authority over
men.
Democrats have heavily criticized Trump's
"hope-that-the-Russians-find-Hillary's-missing-e-mails"
remarks on Wednesday and have come close to accusing the
billionaire New Yorker of treason. But according to
Carlton Larson, University of California at Davis law
school professor and expert on treason: "what Donald Trump
said does not amount to treason."
The law stipulates that a person who gives "aid or comfort"
to a country that is currently at war with the U.S., or
who wages war against the nation personally, is guilty of
treason. Trump's words, though encouraging, didn't provide
anything material that would aid or comfort an enemy of
America, and Russia is not a country that is currently at
war against the U.S.
"Putting the interest of another country ahead of the
United States, though a bad thing to do, is just not
adhering to an enemy," Larson told NBC News.
I guess then that even
top-secret-govt-documents-on-her-private-civilian-server
"oopsie"-emailer Hillarius was not guilty of treason
concerning her shenanigans, but can you imagine her
irresponsible mindlessness and devious fingers on the
nuclear-missile-launch-codes buttons?
So Trump "sort of" admires the Johnny-Carson-like-appeal
professional-rhetoric propagandizer Barack Obama:
Iran-funding/Israelis-despising promoter of Planned
Parenthood abortion choice and advocate for homogay
sodomy-unions-licensing.
I have enough Holy-Spirit-discernment savvy to nevermore
listen to such a liar who ridicules the
NON-"conspiracy-theory" FACT that he was born in Kenya
and not in Hawaii
[ explore http://layleftlayrite.tripod.com ]
Actually, yours truly never watched any part of any night
of the televised 2016 DNC parade and charade of
anti-sexual-morality blatterers, as I have never watched
even one episode of Super-Twit Megyn Kelly's "Kelly Files"
program, nor watched her moderate or speak during the
2016 RNC debates. Seems like the demonically-ambitious
frequently-sleevesless chauvinistic creep of cutesey
repugnance finally bit the Ailes hand that fed her, and
now her income might have to now come from posing for
porn media sophisticates.
Why did Hillary choose a closet MALE liberal [a man!] who
the satanic media makes out to be a quasi-conservative...
instead of selecting some woman like Warren or Feinstein
to be her women-must-rule VP partner in anti-patriarchy?
Besides the stay-at-home democrats bored with Hillary
and even frightened by her dangerous and possibly even
murderous track record with Billy Boy back in the late
90s and beyond, the Nader-reminiscent alternative of
third-party Gary Johnson and Jill Stein will be chosen
by millennials daring to vote differently "because they
can."
Donald Trump said that he would support increasing the
federal minimum wage to "ten bucks" an hour, at least
beginning such pay raise in the States.
The evangelical Christian right are correct to vote
Trump instead of Clinton - simply on the basis of
gender (according to Biblical directives). We are not
talking mere negroid skin color here in the context
of colorblind Scripture, but instead GENDER relating
to which one should be in general-public authority on
the highest level....about which the Bible has a LOT
to say.
Any church, synagogue, mosque, or temple - any leadership
of which does not discriminate against but instead tolerates
inclusive cultural diversity of feminist sexist, warm-weather
immodestly-misattired, homogay effeminate, same-gender
homosodomy-unions-licensing pseudo-"marriage" advocates,
transgendered or transsexuals, transvestites, abortionists,
evolutionists, and/or boycott-Israel antisemitic - must
promptly have their tax-exempt status revoked.
- http://confrontation.faithweb.com/hilykily.htm
Obamanation plans to persist, day after day, to TRY to get (not "get"
without the "try to" part)...whether by Chicago-gangland-style-vandal or
other extortion using blacks or whoever else, and/or
re-election-of-Republican-Senators threats, female seduction for blackmail,
and/or whatever, a demanded hearing by Obamanites against the wishes of the
Republican-controlled Senate Judiciary Committee for his
deceitfully-nefarious-underneath-it-all Supreme Court nominee(s) reminds me
of the following Bible story:
Judges 16:4 After this, Samson fell in love with a woman in the
valley of Sorek; she was called Delilah.
5 The Philistine chiefs said to this woman, "Charm him and find out where he
gets such strength and how we can defeat and tie him up. Each of us shall give
you eleven hundred pieces of silver."
6 So Delilah asked Samson, "Tell me, please, where do you get such strength
and how can others tie you up to subdue you?"
7 Samson answered her, "If they bind me with seven new and moist bowstrings,
then I shall lose my strength and be as any other man."
8 The Philistine chiefs sent seven new bowstrings that had not been dried to
Delilah, and she tied Samson with them.
9 With men hidden in her dwelling, she shouted, "Samson, here come the
Philistines!" Samson broke the bowstrings as if they were burned flax. So they
did not find out where his great strength came from.
10 Then Delilah said to Samson, "You made a fool of me, and you lied to me.
Tell me, how can they subdue you?"
11 Samson answered her, "If they bind me this time with seven newly-braided
ropes which have never been used, then I shall lose my strength and be like
any other man."
12 So Delilah bound him with seven newly-braided ropes. But when she shouted,
"Here come the Philistines!" he again snapped the ropes round his arms like
thread.
13 So Delilah said to him, "How long will you deceive me and lie to me? Tell
me how they can subdue you." He answered her, "If you braid the seven locks of
my hair in the warp of the loom and tighten it with a pin, then I shall lose
my strength."
14 She lulled him to sleep, and then braided the seven locks of his hair in
the warp of the loom and tightened it with a pin. Then she cried, "Here come
the Philistines!" Samson woke up and pulled the warp with the locks of his
hair. And so, Delilah did not find out where his great strength came from.
15 Then Delilah said to him, "You say that you love me, but your heart is not
with me. Three times, you have deceived me and have not told me from whence
your great strength comes."
16 And as Delilah insisted and bothered him day after day with her questions,
the time came when Samson felt he would die in disgust.
17 So he told her the truth: "Never has my hair been cut for I am a Nazirite,
consecrated to God from the womb of my mother. If my hair is cut, then I
shall lose my strength and be like any other man."
18 Delilah understood that he had told her the truth this time, so she called
the Philistine chiefs and said, "Come, because Samson has revealed his secret
to me." They took the money and came to her.
19 Delilah lulled Samson to sleep upon her knees and called a man to cut the
seven locks of his hair. And she could immediately subdue him for his
strength had left him.
20 When Delilah shouted "Samson, the Philistines!" he awoke and thought that
he could still save himself as on other occasions. But he did not know that
the LORD was no longer with him
21 So the Philistines seized him, gouged out his eyes, and brought him to
Gaza. There they bound him with two bronze chains and made him turn the mill
in the prison.
I should not talk about my great+ grandmother Eve back in the Garden of
Eden that way, should I?
Should show some respect, right?
If you think that THAT is inappropriate, or even "bad," it sounds like King
David was damn close to possessing and exhibiting a sickening homosexual
attitude toward the male Jonathan according to renditions of the following
Bible verses:
Second Samuel 1:26 (JB2000) I am distressed for thee, my brother
Jonathan; very pleasant hast thou been unto me; thy love to me was wonderful,
passing the love of women.
26 (JPS) I am distressed for thee, my brother Jonathan; very pleasant
hast thou been unto me; wonderful was thy love to me, passing the love of
women.
26 (KJ21) I am distressed for thee, my brother Jonathan; very pleasant
hast thou been unto me. Thy love to me was wonderful, passing the love of
women.
26 (Leeser) I am distressed for thee, my brother Jonathan; very dear
hast thou been unto me: wonderful was thy love for me, passing the love of
women.
To WHAT adult male human would I EVER mouth the phrase: "You have been very
PLEASANT to me; your LOVE was WONDERFUL, SURPASSING the LOVE of WOMEN."
Disgusting. Yes? If I ever said those particular near-effeminate
close-to-obnoxious words to an adamantly-anti-homogay righteous man, he would
possibly slap me, or at least come VERY close to slapping me, in the face....
and I would not blame him.
Not much better is:
26 (GWV) I am heartbroken over you, my brother Jonathan. You were MY
GREAT DELIGHT. Your LOVE was more WONDERFUL to me than the LOVE of WOMEN.
Other translational renditions of that verse sound a lot more acceptable in
parts:
26 (Douay) I grieve for thee, my brother Jonathan: EXCEEDINGLY
BEAUTIFUL, and amiable [much better!] to me above the love of women.
As the mother loveth her only son, so did I love thee.
26 (Message) O my DEAR brother Jonathan, I’m crushed by your death.
Your friendship [instead of "love" - much better!] was a miracle-wonder,
love far exceeding anything I have known or ever hope to know [the
women-comparison part is omitted]
As I said, David's feminine-sounding adoration words for the male Jonathan -
particularly with David's questionable and perhaps-needless reference to love
of WOMEN - seems QUITE peculiar and queer.
What did David mean when he stated the phrase: "...passing the love of women?"
Was he talking in a homoerotic sense (both homogay and homosodomite)?
Or was he instead simply stating an anti-feminist-sexist pro-patriarchal
platitude that: no inferior-gender woman could ever respect, honor,
admire, and appreciate him like a superior-gender man could and had?
David's son Solomon also uttered something patriarchally similar, though not
qualifying as to what was the subject and context involved as to the person
"found" versus "not found:"
Ecclesiastes 7:25 "I turned my mind to know and to search out and to
seek wisdom and the sum of things, and to know the wickedness of folly and
the foolishness which is madness.
26 And I found more bitter than death the woman whose heart is snares
and nets, and whose hands are fetters; he who pleases God escapes her, but the
sinner is taken by her.
27 Hey, this is what I found," says the Preacher, "adding one thing to
another to find the sum,
28 which my mind has sought repeatedly, but I have not found. ONE MAN
among a thousand I FOUND, but a WOMAN among all these I HAVE NOT FOUND.
29 Hey, this alone I found, that God made man upright, but they have
sought out many devices [lame excuses or irrationalizations].
Saint Paul tied right in with his negative take NOT on the inferior gender per
se, but on inferior gender craving authority over men and being put into
authority over men by accursed-wimp cowards and patsies this way:
First Timothy 2:11 Have [not necessarily "let"] a woman learn
in silence with all subjection [not necessarily "submissiveness" -
which term has a sexual connotation and aura to it].
12 I allow [or "permit," if licensing is involved] no woman to teach
or to have authority over "men" [referring to human MALES - not
"man"-kind nor "humankind"]; she is to keep silent.
13 For Adam was formed first [that IS important, as you will discover],
then Eve;
14 and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a
transgressor [i.e. wicked, evil, Hell-bound].
15 Yet woman will be "saved" by bearing children [among a bunch of
other more-important things relating to perfectly obeying ALL Law 24/7 and
accepting Jesus Christ as her Redemptive Savior], if she continues in faith
and love and holiness, with sobriety.
Do NOT casually or indifferently dismiss the above Scripture quotation as
"women hatred" or "woman hatred."
You will soon see why.
What's the problem with women? Is there good cause for what might appear to
some to be misogyny [i.e. excessive mistrust or hatred against women in
general]?
The slanderous would mindlessly and scurrilously accuse both David of Solomon
of woman-hatred or femmaphobia [fear of women].
A quick sarcastic answer would obviously be: "Of course, that's why David was
happily married to five wives and ten concubines, and Solomon maritally
enjoyed one hell of lot more of both than that."
It is clear that even David and Solomon abhorred the Demon of Feminist Sexism
driving men to effeminate-sodomy homosexuality [with "effeminate" being the
passive partner, and "sodomite" being the active partner]
Let's analyze the exact words found in the early chapters of the Old-Testmament
book of Genesis to discover NOT what is mis-termed "woman-aversion" but instead
simply reveals the characteristics of FEMALE human gender the LORD created not
merely "because He [not "she"] could" but also "because He
wanted to do what He could:
Genesis 2:15 The LORD God took the man with a non-transgendered/non-transsexual
penis and put him in the garden of Eden to till it and keep it.
16 And the LORD God commanded the man, saying: "You may freely eat of every tree
of the garden;
17 but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the
day that you eat of it you shall die."
18 Then the LORD God said: "It is not good that the man should be alone; I will
make him a helper fit for him."
19 So out of the [inanimate/lifeless] ground [not evolved out of
lightning-struck evolving pond-slime] the LORD God formed every beast of the field
and every bird of the air, and brought them to the man to see what he would call
them; and whatever the man called every living creature, that was its name.
20 The man gave [quasi-complex alphabetizable] names to all cattle, and to the
birds of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for the man there was not
found a helper fit for him.
21 So the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon the man, and while he slept
took one of his ribs and closed up its place with flesh [painless major surgery
with Divine anesthesia?];
22 and the [bloody bone-marrow] rib which the LORD God had taken from the man He
made into a woman [and it has been Woe-Man ever since? NOT!] and brought her to
the man [ladies, go after your choice of gentlemen, so we do not have to go after
you and risk being turned down and disappointed. Be aggressive, do NOT be wimps,
but YOU let us know who you want your choice of guy to be to genitalize you. Be
ready to kneel down near his crotch, and beg. Courageously sign up with that
dating service. Do not be too picky. Be brave, squaw. C'mon - you got the balls
for it, don't you?]
23 Then the man said: "This at last is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh;
she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man." [One heck of a name
he gave his own former rib. Can you imagine him calling her THAT?]
24 Therefore a man leaves his father and his mother and cleaves to his wife, and
they become one flesh. [Oh XXX yes!]
25 And the man and his wife were both naked [heavy R-rated], and were not ashamed.
[Wow!]
Genesis 3:1 = Now the serpent was more subtle ["subtle?" Try DECEPTIVE instead]
than any other wild creature that the LORD God had made. He said to the woman: "Did
God say: "You shall not eat of any tree of the garden"?
WHY did the Tempter ask that "Did God say?" question? Did questionably-omnipresent
Satan not know what God had actually said previously to Adam back in Genesis
chapter 2? Was Satan deaf at that time? Was he forgetfully senile and could not
remember it? Or was he trying to be "cute?" Or attempting to misrepresent the
Source or the properly-translated Content of the "Don't-Eat-THAT-Tree" God's Word
command which Adam very probably told to Eve verbatim?
And get what Satan said: "You shall not eat of ANY tree in the Garden" - inferring
that God wanted Eve and Adam to starve to death, or eat only grass, and that without
salt and pepper. Note how negatively inclusive his misinformational remark was.
"No, you CANNOT enjoy life doing ANYTHING which gives either of you guys pleasure.
You cannot breathe, eat, drink, urinate, defecate, run, walk, lay down, get up,
sleep, nor wake up. ETERNAL abstinence. NO sex EVER. No children EVER. Become
extinct."
2 = And the woman said to the serpent: "We may eat of the fruit of the trees of
the garden..
Note that Eve's answer is positively inclusive, until she qualifies it with her
missed-the-point legalistically-added-adiaphoric answer:
3 = but God said: "You shall not eat of the fruit of the tree which is in the
midst of the garden, neither shall you touch it, lest you die."
What the HAEL kind of a WRONG characterization did Eve give Satan of the Forbidden
Tree? What is that pseudo-"creative" but absurdly asinine qualification of the
Forbidden Tree being "the one in the midst of the Garden?" WHERE did she come up
with THAT, and why did she even mention it's geographic positioning and location?
What did THAT have to do with anything?
She, in her inferior-gender inability to discern the true morality/immorality-related
nature of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, was stunning concerning her
stupidity, but typical of all women thereafter who in their inferior-gender stupidity
frequently do not "get the point" of morality-related qualification, but go off on
some goofy, inapplicable, and non-necessary other-description of things.
What's with the additional part of "...neither shall YOU touch it."
What is this "you" wording? Did the command of God exclusively apply only to the
Tempter? Why did she not apply it to HERSELF? [I hate preachers who constantly
accuse and hypocritically condemn congregants with only "you" in their rants]
And who ever said anything about "touching" the Tree? God never said that to Adam.
EVE added that "out of the blue" - out of NO WHERE - out of her own legalistic
adiaphora-added immentality.
4 = But the serpent said to the woman: "You will not die."
An outright and blatant lie on TWO counts: First, her DNA started dying the moment
she ate the Forbidden Fruit and her cellular structure immediately began to
deteriorate and genetically go screwy. Second, she ultimately she did
COMPLETELY die. So Satan was lying on two counts.
5 = For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will
be like God, knowing good and evil."
Oh, so Satan presumed to be speaking for God then. "Minnesotans voted for
Obama/Franken." NO, fraudulently-misrepresentative lying Star-Tribune
reporter or editorialist: only SOME Minnesotans voted for Obama/Franken. How did
Satan presumably "know" what GOD thought or thinks? Does HE have the mind of
Christ? So Satan indirectly defamed Eve by insinuating the accusation against
her of her being shamefully blind without "opened eyes." Laughably inadequate.
Pitifully uneducated. Embarrassingly deficient. Suckhole to Playboy Trump or
else Bernie will win.
6 = So when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, [WHY does the Holy
Spirit speaking through Moses the human author now describe things from Eve's
distorted viewpoint? WAS the Tree ACTUALLY "good for food" - OR instead lethally
POISONOUS?] and that it was a delight to the eyes [WAS the Tree ACTUALLY a
"delight" to the eyes?], and that the tree was to be desired [WAS it desired, or
instead should it have been ABHORRED?] to make one wise....
"Wise?" That's ENOUGH!. "Wise" in a pig's eye. Informed,
yes. "Wise"- NO!
Stupid, yes. Enlightened, NO!
.... she took of its fruit and ate; and she also gave some to her husband, and
he ate.
7 = Then the eyes of both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they
sewed fig leaves together and made themselves aprons. [thong bikini bottoms were
not enough, per]:
Genesis 3:21 And the LORD God made for Adam and for his wife garments of
skins [tux with black shoes and socks for him, and slippers plus burka/hijab for
her], and clothed them.
There went the neighborhood. She royally screwed things up - for EVERYONE - from
there on. Thanks, Eve - for NOTHING! We would all have been one happy and
shameless big nudist family, community, and nation on planet Earth if you had not
become and been such an insubordinately-disobedient, selfishly self-serving,
feminist-sexist-knowledge-and-power-craving, pompously-defiant and gullible ASSHOLE.
Silly and cumbersome clothes would probably have been invented by the Spirit-inspired
for survival in outer-space-exploration conditions and for other hostile-against-humans
environmental scenarios, but certainly not ever required, even to prohibit and prevent
modesty-and-immodesty-free incitement for fornication and adultery nor dire myriad
consequences thereof.
It is no wonder that master-Jew Saint Paul, speaking words from the Holy Spirit,
perceptively wrote:
First Timothy 2:11 HAVE a woman learn in silence with all SUBJECTION.
12 I allow NO woman [especially Benghazi-botching Vince-Foster-murdering
Hillary Clinton] to teach or to have authority over [ MALE] men; she is to keep
silent.
13 For Adam was formed first, then Eve;
14 and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a
transgressor.
15 Yet woman will be saved by bearing children, IF she continues in faith
and love and holiness, with self-controlled sensibility [NONE of which applies to
BitchWitch inferior-gender Hillary Clinton].
If any of the Founding Fathers of America, or prophets of the Old Testament, or
apostles and disciples of the New Testament, were to awake from the dead, and be
presented with the question of whether or not Hillary Clinton (or any
inferior-gender human, for that matter - be she Queen Elizabeth, Bloody Mary,
Golda Meir, Angela Merky, whoever) should become and be the President of the United
States...the most powerful person in authority on planet Earth...their polite and
courteous response might promptly be:
"Are you absolutely out of your FUCKED UP mind for even MOUTHING such a DIABOLICAL
and ABOMINABLE thing?"
The phenomenally-deviant might then come back with the query: "Why NOT -
if she has a superior-gender VP running mate?" - to which the immediate
follow-up might be:
"I would not care if he were Jesus Almighty Christ or His Semi-Holiness the Pope in
Rome. How can you be so SHITHEAD insane to even MENTION what you have SATANICALLY
suggested?"
Are all womb-babes and infants automatically sanctified at the
time, and thus "holy" - whether they have a believing dad and
disbelieving mom or vice-versa (see Romans 7) or both parents
are either believers or disbelievers?
"The children shall not suffer for the sins of the parents"
says Ezekiel chapter 18 (even though the context of that chapter
seems to mainly apply to having-reaching-accountability-age
sons with daughters never mentioned).
Although womb-babes and newborns are "born into sin" and
"conceived in sin" per Psalm 51:5 (as in the case of the virgin
Mary non-coitally conceiving Jesus), not-yet-born babes are
"called by God" and "elected for salvation" not by works of
human-effort water baptism but because of "God's call" -
accordinging to Romans 9:11, which babes are qualified for such,
being that they have "done nothing either good or bad"
in pre-and-post context according to that verse.
So IS pedobaptism (or paedobaptism), in which "rantismos" is
performed (i.e. sprinkling or pouring water on the head and
not instead merely on the feet for footwashing compliance
of and for those already mostly and adequately bathed in water
and not fully immersed....NOR COMPLETELY submerged in either
dirty river water or literally in the actual chromosome-rich
"the blood of the Lamb") justifiable - despite complete absence
of the mention of any womb-babe perhaps preordained and
commissioned by God to be a future prophet when yet
womb-confined (Jeremiah 1:5), or newborn infant, in the
entirety of the Old-and-New-Testaments Holy Bible?
Was the penitent thief on his cross baptized with water after
giving his testimony-like petition to Jesus as "Lord" prior to
his painful demise?
Moreover, even though a fully-aware-of-what-they-are-choosing
pre-baptized adult utters words ALLEGING belief in the Law and
gospel of Christ, IS their testimony trustworthy and credible,
even in view of Scripture stating: "By your words you will be
justified, and by your words you will be condemned" (Matthew
12:37)....and at WHAT point does a pre-baptized man or woman's
obvious or concealed CARNALITY of whatever types and severities
disqualify his or her profession of belief in and allegiance to
Christ's Law and gospel of gracious atonement as justification?
Explore www.reformedreader.org/rbb/broadus/immersionbroadus.htm
and www.seeking4truth.com/is_infant_baptism_protestant.htm
plus other essays on the Web concerning rather than regarding
fatal-immersion-only water baptism, or non-immersion-is-best
argumentation.
During baptizing, no mention of anointer or baptizer hand
contact on what body parts of anointed or baptized is ever
mentioned anywhere in Scripture, nor total submersion in a
muddy river, nor lethally drowning a person underwater for
literal application of "being buried with Christ in baptism"
[Romans 6:4]. "Removal of dirt from the body" is not the
intent for baptism but rather "appeal to God for a clear
conscience" according to First Peter 3:21 by washing with pure,
non-previously-used, non-stagnant-water-in-baptismal-font,
sanitary running water [Leviticus 15:13 and Hebrews 10:22] by a
husband with the Word [Ephesians 5:26], [erotically] assisting
his own believing wife [First Corinthians 7:1] which (also
fulfilling the footwashing command of Jesus in John 13:3-15) is
best accomplished by a believing wife, at her believing
husband's bidding and under his authority (be he believing
bishop, deacon, teacher, healer, etc.) carefully stepping into
a moderate-to-warm-temperature non-forceful shower as her
husband pronounces her baptized in the name of the Father, the
Son, and the Holy Spirit [Matthew 28:19] after she has given
her Christian testimony to him [Matthew 3:6, Mark 1:5,
Acts 8:12].
Mis-rendering Galatians 3:27 as: "He who believes and is
baptized may be saved, and he who does not believe but is
baptized is also saved" perhaps seems revisionist to the
soxless and associated perverts giving a barefeet sexshow to a
erectable congregational audience as the (especially-female)
exhibitionist trots into and out of some baptismal font.
Of course, there is nothing which I know of in the totality of
Scripture which forbids genuine Christians from participating
in communion not "often" but instead only annually at Passover,
nor bowing face down to the ground toward Mecca or Jerusalem any
number of times throughout the day, nor anything that forbids
some from liturgically confessing their sins audibly to
congregation or pastor during the first Sunday of every month,
nor prohibits others from being partially or totally immersed
(even head-sprinkled) with water or perhaps blood (Hebrews 9:19)
every or every other Sunday morning during church services.
An alternate (though, arguably, less preferable method of
baptismal immersion) is - after the baptized-to-be has given
testimonial confession and gospel belief declaration - for
a male pastor (observed by males-only spectators)....or female
deaconess (viewed by a females-only audience)....to have the
baptized-to-be stand near the edge of a clean-water,
shallow-enough, jacuzzi-like, swimming pool with recycling
water, and right before pushing them into the water, and them
dropping their baptismal robe to the ground, utter the phrase:
"I baptize you in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy
Spirit" then toss the newly-baptized a large-enough bathtowel
after they climb the ladder out of the pool.
Infants also can be showered instead of head-or-feet anointed
for water baptism, but with special care and precaution, after
which they are expected to continue in and consciously accept
for and by themselves their believing-parents-instigated
involuntarily-incepted-at-the-time baptismal Covenant of Grace
when they reach the age of consent or denial. Decisions
thereof are generally made public in various ways.
Many who were head-sprinkled as infants during church services
cherish their nicely-calligrafied Baptismal Certificate, and
see no need to be re-baptized again or often in some kind of
"believer's baptism" (as if their infant baptism in the name
of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit using non-copious quantity
of water was supposedly illegal, invalid, evil, or damnable).
If mere sprinkling with water on the infant's head is
the technique preferred, what transpires for the newly-baptized
infant thereby brought into God's Covenant Family church is
sort of like a million dollars being put into an escrow account
for the infant -- only to be claimed at a future Confirmation
Ceremony or Altar Call by the then-accountability-aged
previously-infant-baptized adult to proclaim acquisition (with
mandatory Biblical-doctrines-duty strings attached) of that
million-dollar covenant previously laid aside for them...rather
than rejecting it (done by apostates because of their disdain
against and rejection of required Christian-lifestyle
responsibilities associated with claiming the covenant
money-equivalent).
==========================================
Your Internet provider is probably blocking and
censoring your incoming emails.
Call, email or write your Internet Provider and
strongly urge that they do not block your incoming
emails using the Spamhaus blacklist.
Inform them they will be responsible for
any losses you incur as a result of emails you do
not receive.
SPAMHAUS is operated by this deviant criminal. He
founded it. He came up with the name. He runs it and
he uses Steve Linford as a front so he will not have
lawsuits filed against him in the USA:
John Blasik A.K.A John Reid A.k.A Richard Cox
John Blasik A.K.A Spamhaus and long time member of the
KKK REALM OF FLORIDA having engaged in
Domestic Violence, Trespassing, battery, 'Exposure of
Sexual Organs', Indecency with a Child by Exposure
numerous traffic violations, etc.
F.A.Qs
1. Spamhaus blacklist blocks more legitimate mail than
spam.
2. Spamhaus uses blackmail tactics to achieve their goal
of having hosts pay for their list.
3. Spamhaus has become a Spews clone and is completely
militant and out of control.
4. Spamhaus grabs listings from other blacklists in an
effort to gain more profits by having a bigger list.
5. Spamhaus blacklist usage is on the decline and with
your help we can keep it going down.
What Can You Do?
Please contact us at http://www.sfo.gov.uk/contact.asp
If in the USA, write to your congressman and your ISP
and tell them that you do not want your email blocked.
There is no telling how much legitimate mail You are not
receiving as a result of this. and if they have to block
emails then use one of the free Open source lists that are
not used along with blackmail tactics and operated by a
deviant criminal.
Spamhaus closes any site they want when they want, which
is illegal.
Spamhaus is blacklisting and threatening any host that hosts
any site that they wish.
Again, please contact: http://www.sfo.gov.uk/contact.asp
COMMENTS:
Unfortunately there is some elements of truth to this post,
Spamhaus does charge for access to their list if you use it
for a number of servers, and they do have a militant
attitude to their methods. In my experience they dictate who
an ISP can have as a client, just do a google search and you
will find that Spamhaus pressures ISP's and hosters to drop
can cancel clients they decide is a spammer. No appeals, no
process, no due diligence, either capitulate to their
demands and kill off your suspected client or your network
becomes non-usable to the Internet community. It seems that
Spamhaus has become just as despised as the spammers that
they say they are going after. It would be nice to see some
type of representation from the ISP's point of view, instead
of having Spamhaus force the ISP's to do their dirty
work.
----------------------------------------------
Spamhaus.org is blocking our e-mails to the CCR (Central
Contractor Registry). We have never generated spam and our
ISP Earthlink is not a generator of spam. How do we file
an official complaint? How do we contact Spamhaus.org Steve
Linford? What is his e-mail and mailing address and
telephone number?
--------------------------------------------
Spamhause block my IP also. I am a principal of a real
estate agency and loosing money because of this! I tried to
unblock it on their website and got this:
“The IP address removal process failed for the following
reason:
The net block owner's policy does not allow removal from
the PBL.
I am so frustrated and don’t know what to do. Any help
please? my email: admin@ctpropertybrokers.co.za
----------------------------------------------
E-Mail = icorigin@yandex.com