Creatica, Not Premature Ajudgulation

a.k.a. Man to Ape?

One of the best voter guides currently (or hopefully yet) on the Web regarding presidential candidates running for the 2016 election is: http://downloads.frcaction.org/EF/EF16B01.pdf

Most likely, rather-mysteriously recently-deceased Antonin Scalia perhaps never thought of himself becoming a national savior and sacrifice to uniquely, thankfully, and definitively thwart and inhibit Kenyan-not-Hawaiian-born Obama and his pushy and immoral Obamanites by means of a Supreme Court vacancy.

Such vacancy takes pressure off the four good guys on the High Court, in that now none of them have to be the obvious and blamable "swing vote" taking sides either for or against former judicial giant Scalia. The new "anonymous" solidarity for and among them is understandably appreciated and refreshing.

Kenyan-not-Hawaiian-born Obama is the only lame-duck "president" in the last 116 years who had a vacancy suddenly occur in his final year in office. Although it has been 76 years since a Supreme-Court-vacancy candidate was allegedly nominated and confirmed in an election year, the Senate in an election year confirmed President Reagan’s nomination of Anthony Kennedy to the Supreme Court in his last year in office in 1988. In that case, the vacancy occurred in June 1987 when Lewis F. Powell Jr. retired, so he does not meet Cruz’s standard of “nominated and confirmed in an election year.”

The Senate (which now has a substantial Republican majority) - not the President- under the Constitution, has the power of advice and consent on presidential nominees.

Obama and his cohorts cannot override this situation by dictatorial and tyrannous "executive order" from the foreign-born pseudo-"president" never constitutionally qualified to become nor be President. Nor can threats of Obama implementing marshal law be used in this case.

And when the Senate reconvenes shortly after tomorrow's South Carolina 2016 Election (as of this writing), the possibility for a recess appointment of and by Obama becomes moot, until the Senate unconvenes again. The only other recourse for Obamanation is the simple-majority-vote "nuclear option" between January 1st 2017 and mid-January 2017 when the new President is sworn in, if the newly-elected Senate majority is Democrat instead of Republican.

As it is now, the Judiciary Committee is composed of a majority of Republicans, who obviously (and thankfully) has the power and authority to never let any Obama High-Court nominee ever get a floor vote in the full Senate until 2017.

The Republican majority in the U.S. Senate and U.S. House "got Obama by the balls" this time in this scenario, and neither House of Congress is required to even listen to any nominee from the Obama who has already incessantly and relentlessly done so much diabolical damage against anti-feminist-sexist, anti-abortion, anti-homosexual, anti-evolutionist, pro-Israel Christian patriots throughout America and internationally.

The Senate would be lying cowards if they did give any of Obama's nominees any kind of a hearing, being that McConnell already promised that demand from Obama to vet any High-Court nominee from him in this crucial election year is "dead on arrival."

Congress should not even begin to entertain Obama's choices for trojan-horse "GOP-acceptable" "moderates" -- and by not even letting Satan get his foot in the door, senator interrogators will not have to come up with any explanations for not accepting pseudo-qualified nominees:

Proverbs 25:26 Like a muddied spring or a polluted fountain is a righteous man who gives way before the wicked.

Proverbs 29:25 The fear of man lays a snare, but he who trusts in the LORD is safe.

Psalm 21:12 You will put them to flight; you will aim at their faces with your bows.
Psalm 83:16 Fill their faces with shame, that they may seek your name, LORD.

Isaiah 26:10 If favor is shown to the wicked, he does not learn righteousness; in the land of uprightness he deals perversely and does not see the majesty of the LORD.

Isaiah 49:23 "....With their faces to the ground they shall bow down to you, and lick the dust of your feet. Then you will know that I am the LORD; those who wait for me shall not be put to shame."

Jeremiah 1:17 But you, armor up; rise, and say to them everything that I command you. Do not be dismayed by them, lest I dismay you before them.

Jeremiah 5:3 LORD, do not your eyes look for truth? You have smitten them, but they felt no anguish; you have consumed them, but they refused to take correction. They have made their faces harder than rock; they have refused to repent.

Ezekiel 2:6 And you, son of man, be not afraid of them, nor be afraid of their words, though briers and thorns are with you and you sit upon scorpions; be not afraid of their words, nor be dismayed at their looks, for they are a rebellious house.

Ezekiel 3:8 Hey, I have made your face hard against their faces, and your forehead hard against their foreheads.

Daniel 3:17 "If it be so, our God whom we serve is able to deliver us from the burning fiery furnace; and He will deliver us out of your hand, king.
Daniel 3:18 But if not, be it known to you, king, that we will not serve your gods nor worship the golden image which you have set up."

Matthew 7:15 Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves.

Mark 8:35 Whoever would save his life will lose it; and whoever loses his life for my sake and the gospel's will save it.
Luke 9:24 Whoever would save his life will lose it; and whoever loses his life for my sake, he will save it.
Luke 17:33 Whoever seeks to gain his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life will preserve it.

John 12:43 ...for they loved the praise of men more than the praise of God.

First Corinthians 16:22 If any one has no love for the Lord, let him be accursed. Our Lord, come!

Galatians 2:5 ...to them we did not yield submission even for a moment, that the truth of the gospel might be preserved for you.

Titus 3:8 The saying is sure. I desire you to insist on these things, so that those who have believed in God may be careful to apply themselves to good works; these are excellent and profitable to men.

Second John 1:7 Many deceivers have gone out into the world....
8 Look to yourselves, that you may not lose what you have worked for, but may win a full reward.
9 Any one who goes ahead and does not stay in the doctrine of Christ does not have God; he who stays in the doctrine has both the Father and the Son.
10 If any one comes to you and does not bring this doctrine, do not receive him/her into the house or give him/her any greeting;
11 because he who greets [him] shares [his] wicked work.

The other night I wandered into some porn on the internet.

Easy to do...especially being visually attacked and besieged with sudden and non-announced non-solicited pop-up ads and non-asked-for data-consuming streaming vids of semi-indecently-exposed human females immodestly seducing me and others, resulting in us(?) impulsively and quasi-reluctantly craving and caving into urgent search for more explicit and complete female nudity, thus "putting God to the test" and "tempting the Lord our God" in the irresponsible and unwise fervent search to investigate, dabble, and delve into temptive attractions which realistically and honestly invariably have been and remain beyond our strength to not succumb to, lust at [at least temporarily], and finally orgasmicate to with cleanup showering thereafter.

Ezekiel 14:3 "Son of man, these men have taken their [porno] idols into their hearts, and set the stumbling block of their iniquity before their faces; should I let myself be inquired of at all by them?"
Ezekiel 14:6 Therefore say to the house of Israel: "Thus says the Lord GOD: Repent and turn away from your [porno-and-other] idols; and turn away your faces from all your [sexually-oriented-and-other] abominations."

Matthew 5:28 But I say to you that every one who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart.
Matthew 5:29 If your right (or your left) eye causes you to sin, pluck it out and throw it away; it is better that you lose one of your members than that your whole body be thrown into the Gehenna of a perpetual burning garbage dump, or even Hell.
Matthew 5:30 And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away (and have someone cut off your left hand also); it is better that you lose one (or more) of your members, bleed to death or have the cops put you into a psych ward, than that your whole body go into Hell.
Aux 5:31 And if your computer typing fingers or even your nose or toes used to press computer keyboard tabs causes you to sin, cut them off also, and if your desktop or laptop or Android causes you to sin, get off the internet, [and - IF you MUST]: hammer the keyboard, cut the power cord, discard the AC power adapter, take out the battery and don't put it back in, or toss "the damn thing" into the nearest trash bin.

How many can say: "Been there, done that?"

But I do not want to be guilty of suggesting sexual misbehavior:

Ephesians 5:3 Let not fornication and all [porno] uncleanness plus [porno-idolatrous] covetousness be even once named [suggested] among you, as expected of saints...

"What type of porn did you get into?" a person might query of someone suspected of imbibing in porno "uncleanness" (as Scripture refers to it)? "R or X-rated, or both?" they might continue. "Something worse than Google images of male-or-female-human bare feet, legs, arms, necks, or non-colored finger-or-toenails....with or without barbarically-ugly piercings and/or defaced-body tattoos?"

No, not that deplorable assortment of pseudo-"legal" semi-obscene quasi/non-quasi-indecent low-or-higher-powered immodesty, but instead gender-related porn of neither male-only nor female-only body-part(s) exhibitionism -- but both.

"She-males" - to put it in the common vernacular.

"What does that 'transgenderism' pictorially look like concerning (not "regarding") women born with a vagina who apparently have a penis stitched on, soldered on, glued on, or surgically attached?"

Some CLAIM that they sometimes "feel" like the other gender, but WHAT do their actual body parts LOOK like?

With what would some of those kooks fraudulently claiming to actually be transgendered urinate out of: a penis, OR instead a pussy crevice? Perhaps alternate out of both, at their whims?

Strapped-on dildos (i.e. fake rubber or whatever representative-penis popsicle-like objects) are one thing, but an ACTUAL penis somehow REALLY attached to a female human?

For a person to be completely and thoroughly "transgendered," a male human would have to have been surgically implanted with a vulva and vagina and clitoris, a uterus, Fallopian tubes, ovaries - and in fact every single cell in their entire bodies would have to be genetically re-coded pertaining to chromosomes from being XY male to XX female. And a female human would have to have had surgically attached an actual functioning penis capable of emitting both urine and semen, PLUS scrotum and prostate implanted - and in fact every single cell in their entire bodies genetically re-coded pertaining to chromosomes from being female to male.

Impossible!

No more can Kenyan-not-Hawaiian-born liar-and-dictator Barack Hussein Obama authenticate himself being born in Hawaii instead of Mombasa Kenya at Coast Province General Hospital therein...whether he wants it so, or says so, himself [explore http://confrontation.faithweb.com and/or http://layleftlayrite.tripod.com] and/or the Devil's secular media dishonestly and deceptively (though pseudo-authoritatively) relegates such to "debunked conspiracy theory."

Geographically, Kenya is not Hawaii, and Hawaii is not Kenya. Never was, is not now, nor ever will be. Duh.

Are not merely humans, but ALL [living] lifeforms (e.g. microbes, bacteria, sperm and egg, ameba, jellyfish, seahorses, starfish, trees, bushes, insects, mammals, and more) either "male" or "female" -- or instead are some "neuters" with neither male nor female gender, reproducing "asexually"?

Genesis 6:19 And of every living thing of all flesh, you shall bring two of every sort into the Ark, to keep them alive with you; they shall be male and female.
7:3 and seven pairs of the birds of the air also, male and female, to keep their kind alive upon the face of all the Earth.
7:9 two and two, male and female, went into the Ark with Noah, as God had commanded [not "advised"] Noah.
7:16 And they that entered, male and female of all flesh, went in as God had commanded [or: ordered] him; and the LORD shut him in.

The great Genesis-creationist and Benjaminite-Jewish-Christian Saint Paul the Apostle in no way gullibly proclaimed the non-heterosexual asexual myth of human origins from genderless primordial lightning-struck goo when he referred to part of the ancient-and-canonically-established Hebrew Pentateuch under Divine inspiration, specifically in verses 13 and 14 in both associated and rightly-interpreted pre-and-post context:

First Timothy 2:8 I desire then that in every place the men should pray, lifting holy hands without anger or quarreling;
9 also that women should adorn themselves modestly and decently in appropriate apparel, not with plaited hair or gold or pearls or costly clothing
10 but by good works, as befits women who profess religion.
11 Have a woman learn in silence with all subjection.
12 I allow no woman to teach or to have authority over men; she is to keep silent.
13 For Adam was formed first, then Eve;
14 and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor.
15 Yet woman will be saved by bearing children [not condoms nor abortion], if she continues in faith and love and holiness, with sobriety.

Rather obvious it is, and something that almost "goes without saying" (but not quite), is that physical entities which are "living" are distinctly different than physical entities which are "dead."

And what are some differences?

Well, first off, dead things could have previously been living things, and living things could have previously been dead or dead-like things. [The first is easy to agree with, but the second is probably perplexing].

To put it another way, what is now inanimate could have been animate [easy to believe if not understand], and what is now animate could have been inanimate [difficult to believe and understand].

Realize that I am not presuming (not "assuming") the clearly ridiculous supposition that what did not exist (either now inanimate or animate) decided (at some point in time or during some extremely-long or shorter time period) - having a mind of its own (which mind logically did not even exist at the time) - gradually or suddenly brought itself into existence by itself.

Such absurdity of self-creation is the nutty superstition (and not "faith" - semantically speaking) of fool evolutionists.

How and why would an assortment of not-yet-formed car parts still residing as buried iron ore in the ground suddenly and randomly decide by themselves to randomly mine and randomly smelt the iron ore over millions and billions of years, fabricate themselves into car parts during another millions and billions of years, then (over another millions and billions of years) assemble themselves with other car parts (during another millions and billions of years) into a fully-functioning automobile?

When one seriously thinks about it, all that (but not necessarily "who") currently is "alive" (which or who currently has the Breath of God, or Spirit of God within it-or-them and animating it-or-them) originate from previously-operating "alive" "life" like it...something not characteristic of inanimate objects.

Living-lifeform children, or offspring, come from lifeform parents, lifeform parents come from lifeform parents -- all the way back to Creation Week when original and first-time lifeform whatevers and whoevers were incepted and began completely functioning in fully-developed adult form with all parts operational and present...without being partially assembled in separate-but-somehow-magically-joined pieces here and there over various and doesn't-really-matter durations of time yet inoperably incomplete by non-coherent non-intelligently-designed "natural"-process-mechanisms unknown.

Think about that one -- all you who engage in and proclaim irrational and illogical, heretical-apostate, anti-Biblical-creationist "evolutionist" conjecture!

That much of the created-by-God animate originally came from created-by-God inanimate, is clearly indicated by:

Genesis 2:9 And out of the ground the LORD God made to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight and good for food, the Tree of Life also in the midst of the Garden, and the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.
Genesis 2:19 So out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field and every bird of the air, and brought them to the man to see what he would call them; and whatever the man called every living creature, that was its name.

Genesis 2:7 then the LORD God formed man of dust from the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living being.
Genesis 3:19 "In the sweat of your face you shall eat bread until you return to the ground, because out of it you were taken; you are dust, and to dust you shall return."

Job 10:9 Remember that you have made me of clay; and will you turn me to dust again?

Job 34:14 If [God] would take back His Spirit to Himself, and gather to Himself His breath,
Job 34:15 all flesh would perish together, and humans would return to dust.

Psalm 30:9 "What profit is there in my death, if I go down to the Pit? Will the dust praise you? Will it tell of your faithfulness?"
Psalm 103:14 ...because He knows our frame; He remembers that we are dust.

Ecclesiastes 3:20 All go to one place; all are from the dust, and all turn to dust again.

Ecclesiastes 12:1 Remember also your Creator in the days of your youth, before the evil days come, and the years draw nigh, when you will say: "I have no pleasure in them";
Ecclesiastes 12:7 ...and the dust returns to the Earth as it was, and the spirit returns to God who gave it.

First Corinthians 15:47 The first human was from the Earth, a man of dust; the second human is from Heaven.
15:48 As was the human of dust, so are those who are of the dust; and as is the human of heaven, so are those who are of heaven.
15:49 Just as we have borne the image of the human of dust, we shall also bear the image of the human of heaven.

When was it that you ever heard of an evolutionist claiming not that apes evolved into humans....but that some (and why not all?) humans have evolved or are evolving into apes, then fish, then primordial amino-acids goo?

Why would evolution only proceed from less advanced to more advanced? Why would it not also proceed from more advanced to less advanced lifeform species?

Not joking or jesting that with some nitwits, digression appears to indeed be proceeding quite definitively, consider this admission of recomposition and decomposition:

John 9:39 Jesus said: "For judgment I came into this world, that those who do not see may see, and that those who see may become blind."

That reaffirms what David said:

Psalm 69:23 Let their eyes be darkened, so that they cannot see; and make their loins tremble continually.

And what Saint Paul observed:

Romans 1:21 ...for although they knew God they did not honor Him as God or give thanks to Him, but they became futile in their thinking and their senseless minds were [self-] darkened.
Romans 11:10 ...let their eyes be darkened so that they cannot see, and bend their backs forever."

Ecclesiastes 7:13 Consider the work of God; who can make straight what He has made crooked?

So "straight" is not always preferable or even possible to "kinky?"

Ephesians 4:18 ...they are darkened in their understanding, alienated from the life of God because of the ignorance that is in them, due to their hardness of heart;
Ephesians 4:19 they have become callous and have given themselves up to licentiousness, greedy to practice every kind of uncleanness.

Second Peter 2:22 It has happened to them according to the true proverb: The dog turns back to his own vomit, and the pig is washed, only to wallow in the mire.

The desire to "evolve" into God-like perfection without the Divine procedure of the Lord Himself resurrecting and impeccably-restoring/reconstructing decaying human (not lower-lifeform) bodies in graves and cemeteries, is pompous-mule blasphemy.

What are some characteristics of "living" in stark contrast to "dead" physical objects, phenomena, or entities within our thankfully-consigned environment which we detect with our five physical senses?

Dead things do not move by themselves, but can be moved by outside forces. Dead things do not initiate reaction from themselves to actively respond to outside stimuli affecting them, although outside stimuli can and do affect and respond to dead things. Dead things are passive by themselves, living things are active by themselves. Dead things are considered inoperative, inefficient, ineffective, and essentially useless - tending to become boring; living things are considered operative, efficient both potentially and actively, and essentially useful - tending to frequently be non-boring.

Speaking of evolution, should not genetic mutations (most being harmful, few being helpful) accumulated from one generation of living-lifeform species and reproductively passed on to the same kind of living-lifeform species eventually get so overwhelmingly burdensome that the increasingly-self-polluted species eventually annihilates itself or themselves?

Why would one presume that evolution is only positive improvement instead of also negative digression?

And why would one mis-term such temporary or permanent alterations or adjustment changes "evolution" -- whether in a seldom-helpful usually-harmful direction, to either emancipate a few one-in-a-million/billion/trillion sterile and at-least-ultimately non-reproductive exceptions (if any) to the conventional/typical majority-species-parameters rule, resulting in net debilitation of a far greater number of non-excepted species of the same kind?

Even though lower lifeform mammals have skulls as humans have skulls, does not mean that lower-lifeform mammals are humans. Apes have leg bones and humans have leg bones, but obviously apes are not humans and humans are not apes. Perhaps the atomic-structure protons and neutrons of DNA and genes in apes and humans are exactly the same, but perhaps they are not. Certainly arranged differently, if so.

There are obvious limits of unique characteristics of the extent and type of genetic alterations either "harmful" or "beneficial" to every lifeform specie, and also reproduced by that particular specie of interest:

Genesis 1:12 Earth brought forth vegetation, plants yielding seed according to their kinds, and trees bearing fruit in which is their seed, each according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good.
1:21 So God created the great sea monsters and every living creature that moves, with which the waters swarm, according to their kinds, and every winged bird according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.
1:24 And God said: "Earth bring forth living creatures according to their kinds: cattle and creeping things and beasts of Earth according to their kinds." And it was so.
1:25 And God made the beasts of Earth according to their kinds and the cattle according to their kinds, and everything that creeps upon the ground according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good.

And God created eventually-extincted-by-pollution whales playing in the non-polluted oceans of Earth, which oceans near San Francisco became polluted and then unpolluted by the 23rd century, irritating the orbital UFO (ticked off by absence of 23rd-century ocean whales) causing worldwide weather catastrophes, until Kirk, Spock, Chekov, and Scotty went back in time by slingshot-around-the-Sun mega-"warp-speed" bringing a couple of whales captured in the 20th century in a starship aquarium of "transparent aluminum" (newly fabricated thanks to Scotty typing in the formula for such on a corporate computer keyboard instead of speaking into the mouse) and dropping such hopefully reproductive-to-be whales into the 20th-century ocean already becoming polluted at that time.

Sorry about that Hollywood special-effects quasi-hallucinogenic reference. But since we have already gotten into some motley lifeforms:

Leviticus 11:14 the kite, the falcon according to its kind,
11:15 every raven according to its kind,
11:16 the ostrich, the nighthawk, the sea gull, the hawk according to its kind,
11:19 the stork, the heron according to its kind, the hoopoe, and the bat.
11:22 Of them you may eat: the locust according to its kind, the bald locust according to its kind, the cricket according to its kind, and the grasshopper according to its kind.

Job 11:12 But a stupid man will get understanding, when a wild donkey's colt is born a man.

And when would that be? How long would it take that to happen?

Devoid of being able to determine or describe the precise mechanism(s) by which genetical material is altered or changed mutationally (at least temporarily), not to mention how such changes or alterations [better term than: "evolution" - positive or negative] considered permanent are passed on reproductively, evolutionists typically divert to illogically substituting million/billion/trillion/jillion/zillion-year time periods as the main means and cause required for supposedly-having-happened positive-not-negative better-not-worse evolutionary changes and alterations.

But time periods themselves (be they very short or extremely long) do not and never have caused temporary or permanent mutational changes or alterations in genes.

If the chemical and/or nucleonic mechanism causing or completing change is not there, time periods - no matter how long or short - are irrelevant, and themselves are certainly NOT a cause for genetic alterations or changes.

Quite likely the benevolent Creator who created living lifeforms has built in some degree or type of "resurrection restoration" mechanism and functioning in [living not dead] lifeforms....overcoming aforementioned accumulation of mostly-harmful mutations which would have resulted in species extinction.

Job 27:1 And Job again took up his discourse, and said:
2 "As God lives, who has taken away my right, and the Almighty, who has made my soul bitter;
3 as long as my breath is in me, and the spirit of God is in my nostrils;
4 my lips will not speak falsehood, and my tongue will not utter deceit.
5 Far be it from me to say that you are right; until I die I will not put away my integrity from me.
6 I hold fast my righteousness, and will not let it go; my heart does not reproach me for any of my days."

Job 32:8 But it is the spirit in a man, the breath of the Almighty, that makes him understand.

Ecclesiastes 3:21 Who knows whether the spirit of man goes upward and the spirit of the beast goes down to the Earth?
Ecclesiastes 11:5 As you do not know how the spirit comes to the bones in the womb of a woman with child, so you do not know the work of God who makes everything.
Ecclesiastes 12:7 ...and the dust returns to Earth as it was, and the spirit returns to God who gave it.

The Spirit [of and from the LORD] has caused, and yet causes, lifeforms to move around in important ways to do notable actions:

Ezekiel 3:24 But the Spirit entered into me, and set me upon my feet; and He spoke with me and said to me: "Go, shut yourself within your house."

The following quasi-euphemistic passage pertaining to resurrection from the dead [not million/billion/jillion/zillion-year evolution] proves that the Spirit of God is what animates lifeforms to breathe, get up, and move around:

Ezekiel 37:1 The hand of the LORD was upon me, and He brought me out by the Spirit of the LORD, and set me down in the midst of the valley; it was full of bones.
2 And He led me round among them; and hey, there were very many upon the valley; and wow, they were very dry.
3 And He said to me: "Son of man, can these bones live?" And I answered: "Lord GOD, you know."
4 Again He said to me: Prophesy to these bones, and say to them: "Dry bones, hear the word of the LORD.
5 Thus says the Lord GOD to these bones: Hey, I will cause breath to enter you, and you shall live.
6 And I will lay sinews upon you, and will cause flesh to come upon you, and cover you with skin, and put breath in you, and you shall live; and you shall know that I am the LORD."
7 So I prophesied as I was commanded; and as I prophesied, there was a noise, and hey, a rattling; and the bones came together, bone to its bone.
8 And as I looked, there were sinews on them, and flesh had come upon them, and skin had covered them; but there was no breath in them.
9 Then He said to me: "Prophesy to the breath, prophesy, son of man, and say to the breath: Thus says the Lord GOD: Come from the four winds, breath, and breathe upon these slain, that they may live."
10 So I prophesied as He commanded me, and the breath came into them, and they lived, and stood upon their feet, an exceedingly great host.
11 Then He said to me: "Son of man, these bones are the whole house of Israel. Hey, they say: 'Our bones are dried up, and our hope is lost; we are clean cut off."
12 Therefore prophesy, and say to them: "Thus says the Lord GOD: Hey, I will open your graves, and raise you from your graves, my people; and I will bring you home into the land of Israel [it started to happen in 1948 Anno Domini, or A.D.].
13 And you shall know that I am the LORD, when I open your graves, and raise you from your graves, my people.
14 And I will put my Spirit within you, and you shall live, and I will place you in your own land [which does NOT belong to antisemitic anti-Zionist "palestinians"]; then you shall know that I, the LORD, have spoken, and I have done it, says the LORD."

Zechariah 12:1 An Oracle. The word of the LORD concerning Israel: "Thus says the LORD, who stretched out the heavens and founded Earth and formed the spirit of mankind within them:
Malachi 2:15 Has not the one God made and sustained for us the spirit of life? And what does He desire? Godly offspring. So take heed to yourselves, and let none be faithless to the wife of his youth."
John 6:63 It is the spirit that gives life, the flesh is of no avail; the [pseudo-cannibalistic eat-flesh/drink-blood] words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life.

Romans 8:22 We know that the whole creation has been groaning in travail together until now;
Romans 8:23 and not only the creation, but we ourselves, who have the first fruits of the Spirit, groan inwardly as we wait for adoption as offspring, the redemption of our bodies.

James 2:26 For as the body apart from the spirit is dead, so faith apart from works is dead.

First Peter 3:18 For Christ also died for sins once for all, the righteous for the non-righteous, that He might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh but made alive in the Spirit...

Lower lifeforms [e.g. microbes, bacteria, viruses, sperm and egg, vegetation, insects, fish, reptiles, birds, non-human mammals] do not have souls - being that such are not "made in the [trinitarian] image of God." Humans are three-entity components of body, spirit, and soul....whereas lower lifeforms have only body and spirit.

Thus, only humans (not lower lifeforms) have eternal destinies of either Heaven or Hell, and are both cognizant of and subject to morality perceptions, abstractions, and responsibility to accommodate to such. Humans can love, hate, lie, steal, fornicate and adulterize and sodomize, and even can be jealous or angry....whereas lower lifeforms operate merely on pre-programmed instincts in response to a plethora of different and combined stimuli -- even in terms of only apparent territorial or mate-acquisition/protection or offspring-protection "jealousy" or "anger" or "loving affection" or "vicious hatefulness." They only instinctually do what they do to instinctually survive with their sensors.

Therefore, beasts such as the big and small wild cats, alligators, rhinos, other lower-than-human mammals, birds and fish and reptiles and insects and vegetation and smaller cannot be accused or guilty of court-appointed adjudicated "murder" or "immorality" or "deceptive dishonesty" (even while using camouflage for instinctually-driven survival purposes).

The obviously-soul-less yet "breathing and speaking" Image of the Beast mentioned in Revelation chapters 13 and beyond in the New Testament of the Holy Bible, which HAL9000-type Data-of-Star-Trek-like super-robot-to-come has no eternal destiny of either Heaven nor Hell predictively prophesied, is clearly dissimilar to the actually-human "beast" and "false prophet" alluded to within those chapters of Revelation.

Thus, IT (not "he") will not be moralistically charged with any moral good nor immoral evil crimes nor sins of any types. When IT kills, such killing cannot and will not legally be termed: "murder." When IT dishonestly lies, IT will simply be doing what it's human programmers have assigned IT to do in response to whatever myriad stimuli IT reacts to....even though deceivers and deceived will mis-call IT a "he" or a "him" -- as they already have done concerning HAL9000 in Space Odessey, Data the Science Officer on Star Trek, and current police who mis-call trained attack dogs "officers."

ADDENDUM:

Perhaps graphic written descriptions are not needed for some who do not want to get into specific details about the now-much-discussed subject of trangenderism and particulars thereof.

Indeed, for some, the sexually-graphic-enough content of some of the complete Old Testament is adequate.

But it does help to warn the naive who surf the Web irresponsibly.

Keep in mind that pix and vids were not included in my verbal explicitness above. Nor were hotlinks to pornsites. Such is notable and commendable.

For many Christians, the pure microbiological illogic and impossibility of true, total, and complete absurd transgenderism is obvious.

Thanks for your patience with me as a reader. Please do not spam me for my pseudo-erotic "suggestive" elaborations, simply disregard them if you desire.