|
|
So now Satan and his blindly-follow-the-herd many-on-the-broad-and-easy-road-to-Destruction immoral-majority morlocks presume that they are on a roll.
They already got their racist belly full of having TWICE elected a wayward-divorcee-with-nigroid-foreigner-birthed nigger to the White House, and now their sexist belly is craving getting a woman into the Oval Office - if not Hillary Clinton, at least Fiorina or some other inferior-gender person as VP running mate to Cruz or Trump or whoever, and thus having a woman "break the glass ceiling of bias, bigotry, and prejudice" by getting into the authority position of being a heartbeat away from the Presidency....and arguably, becoming the most powerful and influencial person on planet Earth.
I admittedly voted for superior-gender Kenyan-not-Hawaiian-born-liar Barack Hussein Obama to become the Democrat presidential nominee in 2008 instead of inferior-gender Hillary Clinton...and in one sense, to some extent, I am glad that I did.
I did NOT vote for Obama in the first half of 2008 because of his skin color, nor for his dangerous-demagogue rhetoric, but ONLY because of his gender.
Sure enough, fact-checked-and-truthometer-verified former-Indonesian-citizen and Indonesian-foreign-exchange-student-at-Occidental-College(?) Chicago-activist-and-agitator Barry Soetoro, with questionable Selective Service Registration and two Social Security numbers [a.k.a. Barack Hussein Obama], did become the Democrat nominee for President in 2008...and the rest is sordid and pathetic history, with who-knows more of it to come.
A majority of voters of Illinois, rebellious and racist, during the Senatorial election before 2008, and symbolically representing the slight majority of rebellious racist throughout the entire nation, made the fatal mistake of selecting and voting in dark-skinned pro-homo-and-abortion-choice Barack Obama instead of even-darker-skinned anti-homo-and-abortion Alan Keyes -- which lethally tipped the symbolic scale balance downward enough so that it is highly questionable whether the United States will EVER recover -- being that Obamanation has so entrenched itself into authority structures with the notorious Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Charles Schumer, Dick Durban, Pat Leahy, Chris van Holland, Lois Lerner, Kathleen Sebelius, Eric Holder, a majority of the FCC commissioners, the current Attorney Generalass, Elena Kagan and Sonja Sotomayor in partnership with Stevens and sometimes Roberts and Kennedy, and many other women in his federal cabinet and female judgeships calling the shots.
When Obama became the Democrat nominee for President in 2008, I of course was ready to vote for purportedly-"conservative" RINO John McCain (even though he was not my preferred choice), but when he chose inferior-gender Sarah Palin, it proverbially "blew me out of the water" -- so much so that I voted for the two male Constitutional Party candidates in 2008 as I had for Howard Phillips in 1992 and 1996 (when Clinton won both times)...and McCain lost, partly because of the [anti-feminist] internet activism of myself and a whole lot of others against inferior-gender Sarah Palin [in my case, on Biblical grounds]....and partly because Obama shrewdly chose superior-gender-goof Joe Biden as his VP running mate [assuring voters that he did not plan to "fundamentally change America" THAT much at THAT time].
The LORD has His own restrained-retributional-fury Acts-of-God "aces in the hole" and played one of them with the non-expected death of Antonin Scalia - which, for the first time, thankfully and figuratively hamstrung, humiliated, stifled, and thwarted demoncrat-pansies-promoted-and-perpetrated Obama and his Obamanites, to the great pleasure of oppressed-with-homo-and-abortion-tyranny elect saints of the Lord, along with any others of the Republican-controlled Judiciary Committee defaulting to that blessed fellowship.
Again, IF Ted Cruz (or - God forbid - Donald Trump) becomes the Republican presidential nominee in 2016, he had better NOT choose an inferior-gender vice-presidential running mate (as McCain chose inferior-gender Sarah Palin in 2008)...or I will AGAIN vote for the Constitution Party candidates if both of those are male...and I would not be surprised if, in that case, inferior-gender Hillary (rather than the socialist-jew Bernie, who I now support to become the 2016 Democrat nominee for President) is elected by the increasingly-insane-and-depraved immoral majority on the broad-and-easy path to permanent eternal suspension and torment within invisibly-flaming outer-darkness Hellfire.
If anyone is deviant, demented, remarkably-stupid, and asinine-enough to indicate they might or will vote for inferior-gender Hillary Clinton in 2016, they righteously MUST be legally discriminated against, despised, ridiculed, and shunned - whoever they are - whether business associates, neighbors, customers, business owners, bank tellers or cashiers, church attendees, media reporters and analysts.....anyone.
It is sort of like when the neighbor to the south of me was visiting me and my sister in our house, and he referred to God in the female gender. Upon hearing that, I reprimanded him to refer to God in the male gender, but as he contentiously ignored me and kept on, I told him to get out of the house, and when he hesitated, I informed both of them that I was going over to the house phone (as I actually did) to call 911 for the local suburban police to come and enforce my demand that he leave or be charged with and arrested for trespassing.
He slowly left before I phoned...and has never come back -- fully convinced of my angry disgust and non-relenting holy hatred against him (and furthermore I have prayed to the Lord Jesus Christ that he never does come back as long as I am in the house).
Some have said to me that the Scripture verse of First Timothy chapter 2 verses 11 through 14 disallowing women to teach or have authority over men only applies to those within the "Church" (whatever "the Church" consists of and does not consist of). They, no doubt, presume that First Timothy 2:11-14 is merely a reaffirmation of First Corinthians 14:33-38 specifically and directly forbidding the inferior gender from mouthing off in church assemblies from the pulpit area or within the assembled congregation during traditional morning services.
But to counteract their non-warranted exclusionism, I have told them to continue on and read the ENTIRE passage in context for what it says. It goes on to state that "Eve was not formed first, but Adam was, and Adam was not formed for Eve but instead Eve for Adam, and that EVE - NOT Adam - "became a transgressor" [even though Eve conspired to cause Adam to also become a transgressor].
When it mentions "Adam and Eve," THAT goes WAY BEYOND the confines and scope of "the Church" [whatever THAT is or is not, and consists and does not consist of].
THAT encompasses and qualifies ALL human authority structures on the planet in EVERY aspect of human activity!
Such premise is OBVIOUSLY substantiated by MANY passages, particularly in the Old Testament (which PSEUDO-"christian" heretics and apostates disdain), like for example Leviticus chapter 27 verses 1 through 5 where it clearly states that a human MALE (of various age ranges) is worth MORE than a human FEMALE (of various age ranges). Clearly, there is absolutely NO "equality" inferred by THAT!
Also:
Numbers 5:31 The MAN shall be free from iniquity, but the WOMAN shall bear her iniquity.
Again, NO "gender equality" is implied there!
Moreover, Solomon [under Divine inspiration from the Holy Spirit authoring The Word of God] stated (and yet states) in Ecclesiastes 7 verses 26 through 28 that "one MAN among a thousand I have found, but a WOMAN among all these I have not found."
In Isaiah chapter 3, the prophet laments (NOT advertises for) the disgusting and despicable feminist-sexist/bratty-children-who-shriek-and-scream repulsive condition of Israel:
Isaiah 3:12 My people: CHILDREN are their oppressors, and WOMEN rule over them. Oh my people, your leaders MISLEAD you, and CONFUSE the course of your paths.
Isaiah 3:13 The LORD has taken His place to contend, He stands to JUDGE His people.
....whether or not they demand that He "keeps His laws off their bodies." [which are NOT THEIR bodies, but instead HIS]
Such a Bible verse in NO way is "antisemitic" against Jews, but IS definitely against feminist-sexist chauvinism!
Another ANTI-women-in-charge-over-men Scripture passage is found in Hosea:
Nahum 3:13 Hey, your troops are WOMEN in your midst. The gates of your land are wide open to your foes; fire has devoured your fortresses.
How many WOMEN were in various positions of authority when 9112001 happened, treasonous allowing NYC-Trade-Tower-demolitionist jet hijackers to enter in with State Department and U.S.-military-security-defenses permission to board the planes at the feminists-in-control "do-not-discriminate-against-foreigners" Boston airport?
NO! IF Cruz, Trump, or whoever caves into the diabolical demons of feminist sexism, and those subtly or overtly possessed by such, by appointing an INFERIOR-gender [not "sex"] VP running mate, they deserve not only to LOSE the 2016 Election, but also be GUILTY and BLAMED for all the dire and disasterous consequences which assuredly will follow - to EVERYONE's detriment.
To those women who presume that a female boxer could be trained to be physically capable to have the strength and endurance to take on someone like Mohammad Ali [a.k.a. Cassius Clay] in his prime [assuming that Ali really tried to win and did not pussyfoot around for the sake of acquiescing to feminists], my advice to them is:
GO ahead and [actually!] TRY it -- but do NOT expect me to bet ANY amount of money on the inferior gender being able to last long in the ring against the renowned and proven heavyweight boxer of all time who figuratively "floated like a butterfly, and stung like a bee."
- http://confrontation.faithweb.com [new hotlinks]
01. ___ I must obey God.
02. ___ I should obey God.
03. ___ I could obey God.
04. ___ I might obey God.
05. ___ I can obey God.
06. ___ I am ordered to obey God.
07. ___ I would want to obey God.
08. ___ I hope to obey God.
09. ___ I could consider obeying God.
10. ___ I might consider obeying God.
11. ___ I should consider obeying God.
12. ___ I cannot disobey God.
13. ___ I never do disobey God.
14. ___ I cannot perfectly obey God.
15. ___ I might not disobey God.
16. ___ I cannot choose to disobey God.
17. ___ I have no choice but to obey God.
18. ___ I should choose to obey God.
19. ___ I must choose to always and perfectly obey God.
20. ___ I can choose to always and perfectly obey God.
21. ___ I might choose to always and perfectly obey God.
22. ___ I have occasionally disobeyed God.
23. ___ I have occasionally obeyed God.
24. ___ I will never perfectly obey God.