Q: "Should a politician end his speech with the quasi-meaningless buzzphrase: "God bless
which - by default - includes solicitation for God's blessing on feminist-sexist twits, homosexual effeminate and sodomites,
anti-creationist/pseudo-scientific evolutionists, pervert pornographers and their indecent greedy-for-money models,
womb-babe-murdering abortionists and their so-called "victim" accomplices,antisemites against Israeli settlements --
all of whom are currently infesting the territory known as the United States?
A: No. They instead should declare: "America, praise God through Jesus Christ!"
Is "liberal" episcopalian Gorsuch a wolf in sheep's clothing?
After the 49-year-old Gorsuch was nominated to replace late Justice Antonin Scalia on Jan. 31, scores of evangelical and pro-life leaders called the nomination a fulfillment of Trump's promise to nominate an originalist, pro-life conservative justice in the mold of Scalia, saying that he has an unwavering judicial philosophy of interpreting the U.S. Constitution as originally written.
Many praised the fact that Gorsuch sided in favor of religious liberties in high-profile cases such as Hobby Lobby and Little Sisters of the Poor and even dissented in a 2016 ruling favoring Planned Parenthood.
However, multiple reports have pointed out that Gorsuch and his wife attend St. John's, Boulder — a liberal Episcopal church headed by a very liberal, pro-LGBT female rector named "rev" Susan Springer [ the title of "rev" in quotation marks is because First Timothy 3 verses 2 and 12 allows only monogamous MALES (that is: "the husband of one wife") to be in ecclesiastical authority in the Church ]
Opposition to Gorsuch's affiliation with St. John's was voiced even before he was nominated.
Christian conservative activist and lawyer Andy Schlafly, the son of the late pro-life leader Phyllis Schlafly, voiced his concern over the possible nomination of Gorsuch in an email sent in November with the subject line: "veto these Sup. Ct. nominee candidates."
Schlafly wrote that Gorsuch "probably would NOT be pro-life on the Supreme Court" and included him on his list of "unacceptable nominees."
v "Gorsuch's Episcopalian church has declared its 'unequivocal opposition' to pro-life laws and he has said nothing publicly pro-life," Schlafly wrote in the email.
Others, including journalist Julia Duin, who previously wrote for the conservative news outlet The Washington Times, have brought up the issue of Gorsuch's membership at St. John's.
"Think about that for a moment. If this man is the frightening conservative that some on the Left are already alleging him to be, there's no way he'd be Episcopalian, much less at a woman-priested church," Duin wrote. "The Episcopal Church, for anyone who's not been following religion trends in recent decades, has been careening to the theological and cultural left for years and its membership statistics show it. Thousands have left TEC and joined alternative Anglican churches."
"A Google search shows there's an Anglican church in Boulder that the Gorsuch family could be attending if they so desired," she continued. "So, the fact that the judge and his family has remained at St. John's says something."
It behooves Donald Trump to publicly declare that women should not rule over men in economics nor in the business world, per obvious contemporary application of First Timothy 2:8-15 among several other similar passages in both the Old Testament and New Testament [ e.g. Leviticus 27:1-5, Numbers chapter 30, Ecclesiastes 7:26-28, Nahum 3:13, KJV's First Corinthians 11:1-16 and 14:33-38, First Peter 3:7 ]
What is the Supreme Law of the Land? What is the Most Important Document Ever Written?
The United States Constitution?
No, it is The Old-and-New-Testaments Christian Holy Bible.
The 19th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution stating that: "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex" should be REPEALED, because of semantical error.
What makes it deserving repeal is mis-worded inclusion of the WRONG term: SEX.
"Sex" might OR might NOT be related to GENDER, but in fact is properly meant to refer to CONNECTION and/or MANIPULATION of various human body parts by a living human being for EROTIC gratification - WHATEVER the gender.
To wit, "sex" can be EITHER homosexual or heterosexual (REGARDLESS of gender), and thus pertain to a male human with a male human, a female human with a female human, a male human with a female human, a female human with a male human, or either gender sensually connected with some living OR non-living object (thus involving self-sodomizing MASTURBATION)...but GENDER ONLY pertains to who or what the Bible describes as being EITHER "male" or "female."
It is the MALENESS or FEMALENESS of a life form which involves GENDER - NOT "sex."
It behooves the inquisitive desiring elaboration to ponder what exactly is meant by "male" or "female" pertaining to human beings.
Concordant with Christian Scripture, a gender-by-birth FEMALE human is one who:
(1) typically menstruates, beginning in their teen years and ceasing to do so usually before age 60. Male humans do NOT and NEVER menstruate as to emitting blood from a vagina relating to female reproductive organs.
(2) has their origin not from dust of the earth, but rather from a rib which God the Creator formed into a sentient-being woman WHO (NOT "which") then possessed awareness of morality and an eternal soul.
(3) has their entire genetic DNA structure comprised of XX instead of XY chromosomes throughout their entire body
(4) was born with reproductive internal Fallopian tubes, uterus, and ovaries, plus a "pussy" comprised of genitalia (vulva, vagina, etc.) usually surrounded (beginning in their teen years) by attractive non-shaved public hair.
(5) can and frequently do become pregnant with child (not merely "fetus"), whereas male humans never have, do not now, and never will become pregnant nor birth children out of a vagina.
[ Job 11:12 = A stupid person will get understanding, when a wild donkey's colt is born a human being. ]
(6) is physically, mentally, emotionally, and spiritually inferior to male humans, thus relegated to being subservient to and ruled by male humans (refer to Genesis chapter 3, Leviticus 27:1-5, Numbers 5 and 30, Ecclesiastes 7:26-28, Isaiah 3:12, Nahum 3:13, First Corinthians 11:1-16 and 14:33-38, First Timothy 2:8-15, and First Peter 3:7).
The above-cited Bible verses are the cause why women should at least be discouraged from voting in government-related elections and at most be forbidden to so vote, because voting in government-related elections is obviously becoming and being part of the government, of which those of the female gender should NOT be leaders over men. That most certainly includes Hillary Clinton.
The infamous transvestite (and perhaps genitally-altered transsexual) Bruce Jenner, who was male at birth, must not be called a "her" nor a "she" ("legally" or otherwise) because of the points stated above -- even though he artificially and effeminately has caused his appearance to display certain and in-some-ways-inappropriate characteristics of a feminine nature (e.g. loose long hair, enlarged breasts?, women's clothing, and so on).
There have been heretical mis-attempts to Scripturally justify the selection and appointment of the inferior-gender, weaker-sex [woman] Hillary Clinton as candidate for President of the United States.
Certain false-religion, feminist-sexist-supportive-and-misminded subversives have mis-applied the stories of Deborah and Esther in the Old Testament, plus the virgin Mary, Anna, Mary Magdalene, Joanna, Susanna, Mary of Clopas, Dorcas, etc. in the New Testament, to allegedly mean that the Lord's will and intention for Hillary Clinton is to become the most powerful person in United States Government.
That, of course, non-conditionally contradicts (no matter what the doctrines-of-demons excuses and irrationalizations) such non-deniable and most-certainly applicable Bible references as:
Genesis 3:16 = To the woman he said, "I will greatly multiply your pain in childbearing; in pain you shall bring forth children, yet your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you."
[So The precedent for all present and future authority pertaining to gender is thereby set]
Leviticus 27:5 = If the person is from five years old up to twenty years old, your valuation shall be for a male twenty shekels, and for a female ten shekels.
Leviticus 27:6 = If the person is from a month old up to five years old, your valuation shall be for a male five shekels of silver, and for a female your valuation shall be three shekels of silver.
Leviticus 27:7 = And if the person is sixty years old and upward, then your valuation for a male shall be fifteen shekels, and for a female ten shekels.
[Though those instructions are given to those within the Old-Testament Hebrew theocracy, of which Moses the male was the human equivalent of a prime minister or president or king, such also apply to other forms of government, such as a parliamentary republic, monarchy, democracy, fascism, nazism, communism, socialism, totalitarianism - whether or not there is "separation of church and state" and whether or not the things of Caesar ultimately belong to God or instead belong only to Caesar]
Ecclesiastes 7:27 = Hey, this is what I found, says the Preacher, adding one thing to another to find the sum,
Ecclesiastes 7:28 = which my mind has sought repeatedly, but I have not found. One man among a thousand I found, but a woman among all these I have not found.
[Which of the twelve apostles of Christ Jesus were women? Which books of the entire 66-book HOLY BIBLE were written by women? Which woman is now pictured on a $1, $5, $10, $20, $50, $100, $1,000 or $10,000 dollar bill? Which of the Founding Fathers were women? Which of Hitler's top henchmen were women? Which of the Roman emperors were women? Did Bloody Mary do anyone any good to the daffy brits who drive on the wrong side of the road and pervertedly wear shortened-skirted hairy-legs-baring kilts (see Ecclesiastes 10:2 RSV and Luke 8:27)? Did Golda Meir un-confuse the Israelis and eradicate the "palestinian" problem?]
Song of Solomon2:14 = Oh my dove, in the clefts of the rock, in the covert of the cliff, let me see your face, let me hear your voice, for your voice is sweet, and your face is attractive.
[Men like Solomon do not want to be sexually harassed nor erotically aroused by seeing the arrogant impudent face of some not-married-to-themselves sexist woman newscaster, anchor, cop, judge, nor politician flapping her irritatingly chauvinistic jaws from the hole beneath her nose]
Isaiah 3:12 My people: children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. Oh my people, your leaders mislead you, and confuse the course of your paths.
[Isaiah here was not limiting his lament to "those inside the church" but rather to most every citizen of his country and nation as a whole. Clearly he was neither advocating that bratty shrieking selfish children should noise-harass others with childish mischief in public, nor advocating that sexually-harassing women be allowed in charge as government officials to exercise authority over men]
Nahum 3:13 = Hey, your troops are women among you. The gates of your land are wide open to your foes; fire has devoured your fortresses.
[The above reference clearly does not merely apply only "to those in the church." Who ever heard of armed military combat soldiers being restricted to being "in the church?"]
First Corinthians 11:3 = But I want you to understand that the head of every man is Christ, the head of a woman is her husband, and the head of Christ is God.
[Notice that the term every [man]. The term is NOT limited to merely those inside "the church," - whatever "the church" means]
First Corinthians 14:34 = The women should keep silence in the churches, because they are not allowed to speak, but should be subordinate, as even the law says..
["as even THE LAW says"]
Galatians 3:28 = There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus.
That verse is, among many others, is one which (as Saint Peter states in Second Peter 3:16) deviates and heretics twist to their own destruction, and have been used by false prophets in sheep's clothing to infer that women are supposedly equal to and with men in not only ability but positional competition.
Though Scripture verses do not contradict each other, many are paradoxical with each other, and must be rightly interpreted by spiritual men who truly have the Spirit.
A few other Bible verses would initially and humanly seem impossible and even ridiculous without spiritual discretion and understanding. For example, when Solomon stated in Ecclesiastes 11:7 that "it is pleasant for the eyes to behold the sun," such is true (unless one stares into it for several hours and goes blind); when Saint Paul stated in Colossians 3:3 that "you have died," when was your date of death recorded by the County or State Licensed Medical Examiner, what casket where you reposing within, where the funeral home where your lifeless corpse temporarily was, and where is the graveyard your body in casket was buried in? He also stated in Philippians 4:13 that "I can do all things in Christ who strengthens me" (including jumping over the Moon without a rocket or out of a high-flying commercial jet without a parachute over farmland and not expect to be crushed upon impact)?
Even the Bible itself obviously and frequently differentiates plain distinctions between Jew and Greek, slave and free, male and female in many other verses of Scripture.
The "one in Christ Jesus" only and obviously applies to certain attributes and circumstances, such as all humans have souls and moral responsibilities and unity of mind (though not of one actual physical body) in Christ Jesus. It does NOT imply equality in terms of patriarchal authority pertaining to non-identical male and female gender]
First Timothy 2:12 = I allow NO woman to teach or to have authority over men; she is to keep silent.
First Timothy 2:14 = and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor.
[What part of "NO" woman might we not understand, the "N" or the "O?" Note the reference to the primal ancestors of all humanity (i.e. Adam and Eve) are alluded to, going way beyond the limited scope of "those in the church." Again, keep in mind that we are not restricting nor quarantining ourselves with any "separation of church and state" presumptions, legally or not, regardless of pussy-wimps who purport that "our kingdom is not of this world," and thus we should retreat out of it and hide, unlike Saint Paul who intimately interacted with Roman soldiers and government, as did Jesus Christ]
First Peter 3:7 = Likewise you husbands, live considerately with your wives, bestowing honor on the woman as the weaker gender, being that you are joint heirs of the grace of life, in order that your prayers may not be hindered.
When King Ahasuerus told Esther that he would grant her only "UP TO half of his kingdom," Persian law did not mandate that she would rule over the people therein, but merely have ownership and perhaps some aspects of caretakership of the property. Ahasuerus, of course, retained 50% possession, and being the one who promised could at any time be one who could un-promise and could depose her at any time as he did against Queen Vashti for feminist-sexist insubordination or whatever.
Judges chapter 4 tells of a judge Deborah who [supposedly] "ruled" but only as an advisor or consultant in a certain sense because pussy-wimp Barack would not go to war without her......and God allowed such, even though obviously it was not His stated intention and will for woman-temporarily-in-leadership to occur; nor war hero Jephthah to murder his own daughter (see Judges chapter 11) which is something even Abraham came close to doing against his only son Isaac; nor His will for Samson to consort with the harlot of Gaza plus Delilah and have his eyes put out; nor His will for David to commit adultery and conspiracy to murder concerning Bathsheba.
The significantly-good GOP platform stances that Sarah Palin and Carly Fiorina have, compared to pro-choice/pro-abortion and pro-homopervert democrat-platform platitudes associated with Hillary Clinton, does not abrogate anti-women-in-charge-of-the-nation Scripture verses cited above.
Even though Palin and Fiorina might or might not contribute to the cause of good with their questionable feminist activism or partial immodesty so far, they (and obviously not body-baggage-laden, national-security-endangering, private-email-server-goof, bitchwitch Hillary Clinton) are Scripturally not qualified to be our national VP nor Presidential leader and Commander-in-Chief.
Ephesians 5:23 For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, and is himself its Savior.
[Ah, here "the church" is indeed mentioned, but Christ is not only the head of the church, but instead King of kings and Lord of lords. Such King and Lord is also overall head of women, and therefore His patriarchal and males-in-government-authority charge is likewise in effect over them]
Those pseudo(?)-"christians" who (like Peter lying about himself never going to deny the Lord, and then actually denying Christ to make it worse) have as their pro-Clinton objective fear of satanic humanity and NOT fear of God within themselves, causing them to try to [anti-Scripturally] set up a purported "prophetess" in government authority because of the wicked spirit of feminist sexism infesting them.