There is no GOD but JESUS, whose Name is CHRIST -
the Merciful and Benevolent, Master of Love and Master of Hate -
who can be PRAYED to THREE times a day, every day.

NO Windows 10! Be content with Windows 7!

One of the favorite verses sexist feminists and their heretic patsies like to cite in trying to justify (but in fact twisting and misapplying) the inferior gender becoming pastors and Scripture-reading lectors during Sunday morning church services within male congregations, female professors teaching men in college classrooms, female elders and deacons in church councils and mixed-gender female choir directors is: "in Christ there us neither male nor female; all are one in Christ."

Taken to the ultimate, such is choice excuse for transgender athletes, locker rooms and shower stalls.

That is (to such deviates) supposed to outweigh, override, and negate counter-Bible-passages of the Eve being Adam's helpmate (not adversarial competitive equal) of Genesis chapter 2, the females worth less than males of Leviticus 27:1-5, the not one worthy woman found among a thousand of Ecclesiastes 7:26-28, the lamenting against women rulership of Isaiah 3:12, the disasterous women combat troops of Nahum 3:12-13, the shameful for women to speak in church of First Corinthians 14:33-38, the women not allowed to teach nor have authority over men of First Timothy 2:11-15, and the husband-of-one-wife male-only-bishops-and-deacons First Timothy 3:2,12 Scripture.

But, apostate supporters claim: "Changing culture over the centuries, especially in recent modern times, has abrogated (so-called) "archaic and obsolete" BIble-verse mandates. "Besides," they lawlessly continue, "we (thus including everyone without everyone's approval) are not justified by obeying the (moral) Law anymore, so it no longer applies to us in the no-more-works-righteousness New Covenant, (even though seemingly-yet-obligatory Law is frequently quoted in the New Testament by Jesus, Paul, Peter, and John). Law currently is merely of passing interest as to how bad and prejudicially oppressive it used to be. Now, Law is both useless and meaningless, even antichrist-like blasphemous and idolatrous if attempt is committed to bring anyone into bondage with it, to try to now misapply it to those saved only by grace in Christ not Law, regardless of whether or not they want to rebelliously disobey outmoded and illegally-discriminatory old-fashioned non-ceremonial? rules and regulations involving haircuts, tattoos, ingestion of pigs and shellfish. And, to Hell with misogynist Paul when he stated that 'his delight was in the Law of God' in Romans chapter 7."

Actually, there is no "right" to murder womb babies by abortion homicide - as there is no right to commit (not perform) any crime nor sin.  There is instead choice to do such evil wickedness.

Reproduction (and "freedom" relating to such) is not involved in and has nothing to do with either childbirth nor abortion homicide.  Reproduction is only involved in conception (which is the Creator's choice and something not planned but beyond the control of would-be parents involving parenthood) and pregnancy prevention items or techniques, erroneously miscalled "birth" "control".

When walking in the women's (not necessarily "ladies") clothing department store, I am inclined to, as I walk along, lift up the short skirt of a mannequin to see if it is wearing panties - but doubt that, if by doing so, I would be arrested for rape or lewd and lascivious conduct.

Most immodestly-misdressed inferior gender impose the immentality of: "You can look but you cannot touch. And you cannot even look, because if you do and I notice it, that would be impolite and obscene voyeurism."

I do not even want to hear women singers either softly and orgasmically or loudly and blatantly bellering out with sexual-innuendo lyrics in stores and restaurants. I engage in selective misogyny, being happily married to the same inferior-gender wonderwife for 25+ years.

Hence, the righteously discriminatory distinction:

Oh MY dove, in the (private) clefts of the rock, in the (secluded) covert of the cliff, let me see YOUR face, let me hear YOUR voice, because YOUR voice is sweet, and YOUR face is attractive (not that of some feminist sexist twit belligerently imposing her face and voice in irritating and annoying non-solicited sexual harassment). - Song of Solomon 2:14

We genuine Christians do not want equal rights for LGBTQ deviants, because it would force us to hire, employ, be defiled by, harassed with, and accept homoperverts and transsexuals in church operations, membership, associations, etc.

As would be the case in Heaven, we (and Christ Jesus with His holy angels) would not be happy with them, and they would not be happy with us, them being constantly ridiculed, shunned, criticized, quarantined, isolated, disdained, righteously hated, vehemently despised, and harshly corrected with a continuous and incessant barrage of Leviticus 20:13, Romans 1:18-28, and First Corinthians 6:9 and applications of all types therewith.  There would be absolutely no love and no mercy whatsoever.

We turn away in disgust from their heresies and displays.  Non-stop.  Continuously.  Without ever relenting.


NOT: "mankind" but INSTEAD: "humankind"

"Rape" Wife?

High-School Graduation-Test Final Exam

CRULES (Control Rules)

No Choice: Dangers of "Original Sin" Theology

FEAR of God?

A Secular Analysis of Origins



As much as possible, it behooves us, the trying-to-obey-Scripture-but-susceptible-to-succomb-to-duressful-temption saints-to-be saints, to avoid going to people events where there realistically and honestly would be potentially-"me-too"-accusatory, harassive and abusive walking [female mopheadedness-and/or-naked-arms/legs/socksless-feet] pornography of live persons imposing their immodest licentious lasciviousness on us against our holy will....unless we get paid for it (e.g. it is part of our employment to get visually assaulted with lewd immodesty, food for us is paid for by those compelling us to accompany them into harm's way, etc.).

The temptation to thereafter covertly search out and masturbatingly self-sodomize to totally-nude, very-easily-accessible, internet porn pics and vids after being relentlessly and thoughtlessly visually attacked with aforementioned non-ponytailed and/or warm-weather-excused sleevesless/slacksless/socksless non-solicited random immodesty is far too great to irresponsibly presume that once we have been unduly aroused erotically by such vile filth "we can just take it, shrug it off, and be man enough to exercise complete sexual self-control" waiting for God to someday in the far distant future finally satisfy us with perhaps insufficient-by-then fulfillment (or so it is frequently and faithlessly expected).

The answer to all those who cruelly and sadistically expect such superhuman abstinence, demanding: "simply turn away once it has suddenly and terroristically been thrust into your face and down your throat, and besides, you can do all things in Christ who strengthens you, having faith to move mountains" is: "Do not put the Lord to the test. Praying "do not lead us into temptation but deliver us away from evil" requires our and particularly their cooperation as much as we and particularly they must do our part to figuratively pluck out the sin-causing worthless eyes of the lust-causing seducers instead of our own precious eyes.

And as to mountain-moving faith, few of us can afford the mighty backhoe and immense bulldozer to realistically move such huge "just take it and shut up" obstacles, and simply talking to non-mere-trifle-molehills into safe relocation makes asinine fools of ourselves when such diabolically-indecent massive mountains are in fact not moved whatsoever.

God requires women to be dressed completely and consistently decent in mixed-gender general-public view per First Timothy 2:9, and if they do not, they are to blame for not walking in love, causing their vulnerable neighbors to stumble, which does no one any good, especially themselves who simply get shunned and castigated for their obtrusive immodesty immentality actions with no satisfying sensual gratification for themselves ever obtained.

The question is: "WHICH Decent-and-Well-Rounded, Practical and Realistic,
Public Sex Ed is Better for an Impressionable Kid?"

To audibly read the restrictive-but-honorably-promising RSV's, NASB's, ESV's, NRSV's Numbers 5, Leviticus 18, II Samuel 13, Proverbs 5-7, Song of Solomon 1-8, Isaiah 20 and 47, Jeremiah 2, Ezekiel 16 and 23, Hosea 2, Nahum 3, First Corinthians 6 and 7.

OR instead to get into . . .

available-to-all-of-any-age, reputationally-non-inconvenient, disposable-with-impunity, immediately-and-safely-gratifying, non-discriminatory, no-"me-too" non-accusatory, non-repressive and non-prudish, non-violent, non-abusive, lovingly-and-considerately non-inhibited, non-sadistically-non-frigid and non-deprivatory, tender, affectionate, beautiful and totally-(not-partially)-nude, oral-on-genital-foreplay porn websites on the internet (which will not be named not for the sake of not exposing devices-of-Satan works of darkness but to not let licentious immorality nor indecent impurity be even suggested among us)


Body Show

Who is God?

Original Sin Nature?

Cateresy: Atonement by Ingesting Eucharist?

NO "Purgatory"!

NO woman should orate in a pulpit nor at a lecturn
near the altar in any Christian church, Islamic mosque, or Jewish synagogue
within a congregation containing men, per First Corinthians 14:33-38 and First Timothy 2:11-14.

Love Hate

Also, NO child 12 and under (noisy or not) should be allowed entrance into any religious-worship sanctuary
per Job 6:24 & 13:5, Psalm 62:1, Proverbs 22:15, Ecclesiastes 3:7, Isaiah 3:12 & 47:5, Habakkuk 2:20,
Zephaniah 1:7 and Zechariah 2:13

Which to Wear: hijab, niqab, chador, or burka?

Men To Rule in Church!

Three Heresies Refuted

Law to Save?

Dress to Caress



Trust God?

Pa - NOT Ma!

Sacrifice for Sin?

High School Graduation Final Exam

Zilch the Torysteller 1
Zilch the Torysteller 2
Zilch the Torysteller 3

P and S #1
P and S #2

Amish Pix

Credibility of Common Sense Science

Hitler Rallies His Youthful Supporters

Nazi Soldier's Rally Song

Navy Hymn

The Glory of the Cross

Cleansing Fountain

Louis Vierne - Messe solennelle en do# mineur - Kyrie

Pilgrim's Hymn (Stephen Paulus)

He Who Shall Endure to the End (Mendelssohn)

Alleluia (Randall Thompson)

Salvation is Created (Pavel Tchesnokov)

Oasis (Maynard Ferguson)

Eiger Sanction (John Williams)

Breath of Stillness

Flos Campi (Flower of the Field, R W Williams)

Dirait on "Les Chansons des Roses" - Morten Lauridsen

Julian Bream | Recuerdos de la Alhambra, Francisco Tárrega

David Russell (Recuerdos de la Alhambra, Francisco Tárrega

Recuerdos de la Alhambra, Cordoba Series Torres Model

Gary Clark Jr. - 12 Bar Blues-Jam @Jam'in'Berlin

Gary Clark Jr. & Junkie XL - Come Together (Justice League)

Louis Vierne Toccata, B flat minor (Peter Bengtson, Organ)

Vierne Toccata B-Moll (Bernhard Hirzberger)

Vincent Dubois - Louis Vierne - Toccata Op. 53 No. 6

Ode to Joy (9th Symphony - Beethoven)

Gloria (Missa Solemnis - Beethoven)

Hoedown (Aaron Copland)

Concrete and Steel (ZZ Top)

Foreigner - "Urgent"

Common Sense Science Hotlinks

The Big Three:

Mate Prep
Mate Exam
Mate Cert

Clean Air and Climate Change


Modest Christian Dress Code

Excluding Govt-Imposed Pro-Homo/Pro-Abort Pagan-Religion Non-Discrimination Statutes for Churches, Synagogues, & Mosques

Need More

Russian Chorale Masterpieces

Without providing the redemptive Jesus Christ as benevolent "Contingency Plan" against
God deliberately imposing the Tempter in the Garden of Eden,
His creation would NOT have been "good" as it states in Genesis chapter one.

Not for All


Scott Walker Sets Anti-Protestors Pro-Economy-Improvements Plan for Trump

Can jews better themselves by themselves alone . . .
or do they always or sometimes need help from gentile Christians?


Jealous and legalistic jews (taking the practice of animal-blood-sacrifice-for-atonement
to the extreme by murdering Jewish Jesus, by command-to-others bodily assault or by cowardly desertion
. . . though some of them later repented of that and became ardent devout Christians)
were to blame for Christ's death on a cross . . .


Jesus Himself was to blame for suicidally letting them pseudo--"legally" murder
(NOT "execute") Him -- when He easily could have prevented all that from occurring.

Judge Gorsuch?

Holy Nazis?

Hotlink to Some Old-Tyme, Junior-Hymnal-Numbered, Evangelical-Lutheran/Baptist, Hymn Titles for Simple Guitar Strumming in the Keys of G and D only

Q: "Should a politician end his speech with the quasi-meaningless buzzphrase: "God bless America"
which - by default - includes solicitation for God's blessing on feminist-sexist twits, homosexual effeminate and sodomites,
anti-creationist/pseudo-scientific evolutionists, pervert pornographers and their indecent greedy-for-money models,
womb-babe-murdering abortionists and their so-called "victim" accomplices,antisemites against Israeli settlements --
all of whom are currently infesting the territory known as the United States?

A: No. They instead should declare: "America, praise God through Jesus Christ!"

Is "liberal" episcopalian Gorsuch a wolf in sheep's clothing?

After the 49-year-old Gorsuch was nominated to replace late Justice Antonin Scalia on Jan. 31, scores of evangelical and pro-life leaders called the nomination a fulfillment of Trump's promise to nominate an originalist, pro-life conservative justice in the mold of Scalia, saying that he has an unwavering judicial philosophy of interpreting the U.S. Constitution as originally written.

Many praised the fact that Gorsuch sided in favor of religious liberties in high-profile cases such as Hobby Lobby and Little Sisters of the Poor and even dissented in a 2016 ruling favoring Planned Parenthood.

However, multiple reports have pointed out that Gorsuch and his wife attend St. John's, Boulder — a liberal Episcopal church headed by a very liberal, pro-LGBT female rector named "rev" Susan Springer [ the title of "rev" in quotation marks is because First Timothy 3 verses 2 and 12 allows only monogamous MALES (that is: "the husband of one wife") to be in ecclesiastical authority in the Church ]

Opposition to Gorsuch's affiliation with St. John's was voiced even before he was nominated.

Christian conservative activist and lawyer Andy Schlafly, the son of the late pro-life leader Phyllis Schlafly, voiced his concern over the possible nomination of Gorsuch in an email sent in November with the subject line: "veto these Sup. Ct. nominee candidates."

Schlafly wrote that Gorsuch "probably would NOT be pro-life on the Supreme Court" and included him on his list of "unacceptable nominees."
v "Gorsuch's Episcopalian church has declared its 'unequivocal opposition' to pro-life laws and he has said nothing publicly pro-life," Schlafly wrote in the email.

Others, including journalist Julia Duin, who previously wrote for the conservative news outlet The Washington Times, have brought up the issue of Gorsuch's membership at St. John's.

"Think about that for a moment. If this man is the frightening conservative that some on the Left are already alleging him to be, there's no way he'd be Episcopalian, much less at a woman-priested church," Duin wrote. "The Episcopal Church, for anyone who's not been following religion trends in recent decades, has been careening to the theological and cultural left for years and its membership statistics show it. Thousands have left TEC and joined alternative Anglican churches."

"A Google search shows there's an Anglican church in Boulder that the Gorsuch family could be attending if they so desired," she continued. "So, the fact that the judge and his family has remained at St. John's says something."


It behooves Donald Trump to publicly declare that women should not rule over men in economics nor in the business world, per obvious contemporary application of First Timothy 2:8-15 among several other similar passages in both the Old Testament and New Testament [ e.g. Leviticus 27:1-5, Numbers chapter 30, Ecclesiastes 7:26-28, Nahum 3:13, KJV's First Corinthians 11:1-16 and 14:33-38, First Peter 3:7 ]



Slap Back (Turn The Other Cheek)


Obey Fuzz

Old-and-New-Testament English Bible Translations Comparison


A Catholic Audience Political Speech

A 2016 Election Analysis


M.Haydn: Requiem in do minore (1771)
Michael Haydn - Requiem - Ensemble & Choir Pygmalion
Theodore Gouvy Requiem
Alexander Shchetynsky- Requiem for mixed chorus
Vieri Tosatti - Requiem (1963)
Richard Wetz "Requiem op 50"
Giuseppe Geremia Requiem
Antonin Rejcha Requiem
Alfred Desenclos Requiem
Giovanni Simone Mayr - Grande messa da requiem in G-minor (1815)
Eybler 1803 Requiem Helbich

Ildebrando Pizzetti: Messa di Requiem (1922/1923)

Lux in Tenebris, Luminosity by James Whitbourn
Giuseppe Geremia Requiem
J Guy Ropartz Requiem
Jehan Alain Requiem
Gorli 1990 Requiem
Vicente Goicoetxea Requiem
Zelenka 1737 Requiem
Jan Dismas Zelenka-Requiem in C minor
REQUIEM Frigyes Hidas

Bach - Passacaglia/Fugue in c minor, BWV 582 (T. Koopman)

Oöphoi - Unbearable Sadness of Memories
Shamanic Tibetan Meditation
Shanti Mantra, Vedic Mysticism, Pandit Jasraj
Shri Anantaha Morning Hindu Chant
Karma Shanti Mantra
Chinese Zen Music: Guzheng & Erhu music
Shamanic Music
Shamanic Meditation
Yoga Music with Glockspiel Bells

Bach 2-Part Preludes and Fugues [ fingering by Icorigin ]
Bach 3-Part Preludes and Fugues [ fingering by Icorigin ]
Hotlinks to YouTube Classical, Jazz, and Rock Music

What is the Supreme Law of the Land? What is the Most Important Document Ever Written?

The United States Constitution?

No, it is The Old-and-New-Testaments Christian Holy Bible.

The 19th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution stating that: "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex" should be REPEALED, because of semantical error.

What makes it deserving repeal is mis-worded inclusion of the WRONG term: SEX.

"Sex" might OR might NOT be related to GENDER, but in fact is properly meant to refer to CONNECTION and/or MANIPULATION of various human body parts by a living human being for EROTIC gratification - WHATEVER the gender.

To wit, "sex" can be EITHER homosexual or heterosexual (REGARDLESS of gender), and thus pertain to a male human with a male human, a female human with a female human, a male human with a female human, a female human with a male human, or either gender sensually connected with some living OR non-living object (thus involving self-sodomizing MASTURBATION)...but GENDER ONLY pertains to who or what the Bible describes as being EITHER "male" or "female."

It is the MALENESS or FEMALENESS of a life form which involves GENDER - NOT "sex."

It behooves the inquisitive desiring elaboration to ponder what exactly is meant by "male" or "female" pertaining to human beings.

Concordant with Christian Scripture, a gender-by-birth FEMALE human is one who:

(1) typically menstruates, beginning in their teen years and ceasing to do so usually before age 60. Male humans do NOT and NEVER menstruate as to emitting blood from a vagina relating to female reproductive organs.

(2) has their origin not from dust of the earth, but rather from a rib which God the Creator formed into a sentient-being woman WHO (NOT "which") then possessed awareness of morality and an eternal soul.

(3) has their entire genetic DNA structure comprised of XX instead of XY chromosomes throughout their entire body

(4) was born with reproductive internal Fallopian tubes, uterus, and ovaries, plus a "pussy" comprised of genitalia (vulva, vagina, etc.) usually surrounded (beginning in their teen years) by attractive non-shaved public hair.

(5) can and frequently do become pregnant with child (not merely "fetus"), whereas male humans never have, do not now, and never will become pregnant nor birth children out of a vagina.

[ Job 11:12 = A stupid person will get understanding, when a wild donkey's colt is born a human being. ]

(6) is physically, mentally, emotionally, and spiritually inferior to male humans, thus relegated to being subservient to and ruled by male humans (refer to Genesis chapter 3, Leviticus 27:1-5, Numbers 5 and 30, Ecclesiastes 7:26-28, Isaiah 3:12, Nahum 3:13, First Corinthians 11:1-16 and 14:33-38, First Timothy 2:8-15, and First Peter 3:7).

The above-cited Bible verses are the cause why women should at least be discouraged from voting in government-related elections and at most be forbidden to so vote, because voting in government-related elections is obviously becoming and being part of the government, of which those of the female gender should NOT be leaders over men. That most certainly includes Hillary Clinton.

The infamous transvestite (and perhaps genitally-altered transsexual) Bruce Jenner, who was male at birth, must not be called a "her" nor a "she" ("legally" or otherwise) because of the points stated above -- even though he artificially and effeminately has caused his appearance to display certain and in-some-ways-inappropriate characteristics of a feminine nature (e.g. loose long hair, enlarged breasts?, women's clothing, and so on).

There have been heretical mis-attempts to Scripturally justify the selection and appointment of the inferior-gender, weaker-sex [woman] Hillary Clinton as candidate for President of the United States.

Certain false-religion, feminist-sexist-supportive-and-misminded subversives have mis-applied the stories of Deborah and Esther in the Old Testament, plus the virgin Mary, Anna, Mary Magdalene, Joanna, Susanna, Mary of Clopas, Dorcas, etc. in the New Testament, to allegedly mean that the Lord's will and intention for Hillary Clinton is to become the most powerful person in United States Government.

That, of course, non-conditionally contradicts (no matter what the doctrines-of-demons excuses and irrationalizations) such non-deniable and most-certainly applicable Bible references as:

Genesis 3:16 = To the woman he said, "I will greatly multiply your pain in childbearing; in pain you shall bring forth children, yet your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you."

[So The precedent for all present and future authority pertaining to gender is thereby set]

Leviticus 27:5 = If the person is from five years old up to twenty years old, your valuation shall be for a male twenty shekels, and for a female ten shekels.
Leviticus 27:6 = If the person is from a month old up to five years old, your valuation shall be for a male five shekels of silver, and for a female your valuation shall be three shekels of silver.
Leviticus 27:7 = And if the person is sixty years old and upward, then your valuation for a male shall be fifteen shekels, and for a female ten shekels.

[Though those instructions are given to those within the Old-Testament Hebrew theocracy, of which Moses the male was the human equivalent of a prime minister or president or king, such also apply to other forms of government, such as a parliamentary republic, monarchy, democracy, fascism, nazism, communism, socialism, totalitarianism - whether or not there is "separation of church and state" and whether or not the things of Caesar ultimately belong to God or instead belong only to Caesar]

Ecclesiastes 7:27 = Hey, this is what I found, says the Preacher, adding one thing to another to find the sum,
Ecclesiastes 7:28 = which my mind has sought repeatedly, but I have not found. One man among a thousand I found, but a woman among all these I have not found.

[Which of the twelve apostles of Christ Jesus were women? Which books of the entire 66-book HOLY BIBLE were written by women? Which woman is now pictured on a $1, $5, $10, $20, $50, $100, $1,000 or $10,000 dollar bill? Which of the Founding Fathers were women? Which of Hitler's top henchmen were women? Which of the Roman emperors were women? Did Bloody Mary do anyone any good to the daffy brits who drive on the wrong side of the road and pervertedly wear shortened-skirted hairy-legs-baring kilts (see Ecclesiastes 10:2 RSV and Luke 8:27)? Did Golda Meir un-confuse the Israelis and eradicate the "palestinian" problem?]

Song of Solomon2:14 = Oh my dove, in the clefts of the rock, in the covert of the cliff, let me see your face, let me hear your voice, for your voice is sweet, and your face is attractive.

[Men like Solomon do not want to be sexually harassed nor erotically aroused by seeing the arrogant impudent face of some not-married-to-themselves sexist woman newscaster, anchor, cop, judge, nor politician flapping her irritatingly chauvinistic jaws from the hole beneath her nose]

Isaiah 3:12 My people: children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. Oh my people, your leaders mislead you, and confuse the course of your paths.

[Isaiah here was not limiting his lament to "those inside the church" but rather to most every citizen of his country and nation as a whole. Clearly he was neither advocating that bratty shrieking selfish children should noise-harass others with childish mischief in public, nor advocating that sexually-harassing women be allowed in charge as government officials to exercise authority over men]

Nahum 3:13 = Hey, your troops are women among you. The gates of your land are wide open to your foes; fire has devoured your fortresses.

[The above reference clearly does not merely apply only "to those in the church." Whoever heard of armed military combat soldiers being restricted to being "in the church?"]

First Corinthians 11:3 = But I want you to understand that the head of every man is Christ, the head of a woman is her husband, and the head of Christ is God.

[Notice that the term every [man]. The term is NOT limited to merely those inside "the church," - whatever "the church" means]

First Corinthians 14:34 = The women should keep silence in the churches, because they are not allowed to speak, but should be subordinate, as even the law says..

["as even THE LAW says"]

Galatians 3:28 = There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus.

That verse is, among many others, is one which (as Saint Peter states in Second Peter 3:16) deviates and heretics twist to their own destruction, and have been used by false prophets in sheep's clothing to infer that women are supposedly equal to and with men in not only ability but positional competition.

Though Scripture verses do not contradict each other, many are paradoxical with each other, and must be rightly interpreted by spiritual men who truly have the Spirit.

A few other Bible verses would initially and humanly seem impossible and even ridiculous without spiritual discretion and understanding. For example, when Solomon stated in Ecclesiastes 11:7 that "it is pleasant for the eyes to behold the sun," such is true (unless one stares into it for several hours and goes blind); when Saint Paul stated in Colossians 3:3 that "you have died," when was your date of death recorded by the County or State Licensed Medical Examiner, what casket where you reposing within, where the funeral home where your lifeless corpse temporarily was, and where is the graveyard your body in casket was buried in? He also stated in Philippians 4:13 that "I can do all things in Christ who strengthens me" (including jumping over the Moon without a rocket or out of a high-flying commercial jet without a parachute over farmland and not expect to be crushed upon impact)?

Even the Bible itself obviously and frequently differentiates plain distinctions between Jew and Greek, slave and free, male and female in many other verses of Scripture.

The "one in Christ Jesus" only and obviously applies to certain attributes and circumstances, such as all humans have souls and moral responsibilities and unity of mind (though not of one actual physical body) in Christ Jesus. It does NOT imply equality in terms of patriarchal authority pertaining to non-identical male and female gender]

First Timothy 2:12 = I allow NO woman to teach or to have authority over men; she is to keep silent.
First Timothy 2:14 = and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor.

[What part of "NO" woman might we not understand, the "N" or the "O?" Note the reference to the primal ancestors of all humanity (i.e. Adam and Eve) are alluded to, going way beyond the limited scope of "those in the church." Again, keep in mind that we are not restricting nor quarantining ourselves with any "separation of church and state" presumptions, legally or not, regardless of pussy-wimps who purport that "our kingdom is not of this world," and thus we should retreat out of it and hide, unlike Saint Paul who intimately interacted with Roman soldiers and government, as did Jesus Christ]

First Peter 3:7 = Likewise you husbands, live considerately with your wives, bestowing honor on the woman as the weaker gender, being that you are joint heirs of the grace of life, in order that your prayers may not be hindered.

When King Ahasuerus told Esther that he would grant her only "UP TO half of his kingdom," Persian law did not mandate that she would rule over the people therein, but merely have ownership and perhaps some aspects of caretakership of the property. Ahasuerus, of course, retained 50% possession, and being the one who promised could at any time be one who could un-promise and could depose her at any time as he did against Queen Vashti for feminist-sexist insubordination or whatever.

Judges chapter 4 tells of a judge Deborah who [supposedly] "ruled" but only as an advisor or consultant in a certain sense because pussy-wimp Barack would not go to war without her......and God allowed such, even though obviously it was not His stated intention and will for woman-temporarily-in-leadership to occur; nor war hero Jephthah to murder his own daughter (see Judges chapter 11) which is something even Abraham came close to doing against his only son Isaac; nor His will for Samson to consort with the harlot of Gaza plus Delilah and have his eyes put out; nor His will for David to commit adultery and conspiracy to murder concerning Bathsheba.

The significantly-good GOP platform stances that Sarah Palin and Carly Fiorina have, compared to pro-choice/pro-abortion and pro-homopervert democrat-platform platitudes associated with Hillary Clinton, does not abrogate anti-women-in-charge-of-the-nation Scripture verses cited above.

Even though Palin and Fiorina might or might not contribute to the cause of good with their questionable feminist activism or partial immodesty so far, they (and obviously not body-baggage-laden, national-security-endangering, private-email-server-goof, bitchwitch Hillary Clinton) are Scripturally not qualified to be our national VP nor Presidential leader and Commander-in-Chief.

Ephesians 5:23 For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, and is himself its Savior.

[Ah, here "the church" is indeed mentioned, but Christ is not only the head of the church, but instead King of kings and Lord of lords. Such King and Lord is also overall head of women, and therefore His patriarchal and males-in-government-authority charge is likewise in effect over them]

Those pseudo(?)-"christians" who (like Peter lying about himself never going to deny the Lord, and then actually denying Christ to make it worse) have as their pro-Clinton objective fear of satanic humanity and NOT fear of God within themselves, causing them to try to [anti-Scripturally] set up a purported "prophetess" in government authority because of the wicked spirit of feminist sexism infesting them.

The SPECIFICALLY-ANTI-CHRISTIAN phrase: separation of CHURCH and state is a bigoted and biased misnomer.

What about separation of SYNAGOGUE and state? How about separation of MOSQUE and state?

The anti-Biblical subversive intention actually meant by the misnomer phrase: separation of CHURCH and state is: separation of RELIGION and state.

And that ILLEGALLY and UNLAWFULLY flies squarely in the face of the two RELIGION clauses of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, which state that "Congress shall make no law establishing RELIGION, nor prohibiting the free exercise of RELIGION.
Sorry, subversives and supporters within "Freedom From Religion Foundation" of Madison Wisconsin...but you all are being anti-Constitutional from the start!

Evolutionists do NOT have "faith." They instead exhibit: presumptive bias.

There is NO such thing as "microevolution" (in supposed contrast to "macroevolution").
Why that is is that "microevolution" is simply a more GRADUAL type of [alleged] evolution (with a NON-existent-but-should-have-been-AMPLE supply of NEVER-YET-found "transitional" species or kinds).
Neither "kinds" nor "varieties" within "kinds" have ever existed nor can exist PARTLY-assembled, whether over long or short time periods. ALL crucial (though not "critical") parts HAVE to be PERFECTLY functioning at the SAME time (like car parts in an adequately-working automobile) or the organism-to-be would never become life-supportive nor live long enough to reproduce.

There are many "kinds" (as the Bible terms them) and NONE of them reproduce into different "kinds", but all reproduced and yet reproduce "after their own kind" according to Genesis chapter one on an Earth initially covered completely with WATER (and not "lava") which Earth was in existence FOUR Creation Days BEFORE the Sun, Moon, and stars were created.

"A stupid man will get understanding, when a wild donkey's colt is born a man" (Job 11:12)

There are obviously "varieties" within various "kinds" (such as birds, reptiles, insects, fish, vegetation, mammals, and so on as described in First Corinthians 15:39).

[ There is ONLY one "kind" of human being - whatever the skin color, eye-fold shape, and other bodily characteristics. All functional humans of whatever so-called "race" or blood type can reproduce with each other. ]

And within each of those "varieties" within "kinds" of lifeforms, ADAPTATION has and does occur because of reproductive combinations, environmental stimuli, etc. producing SLIGHT alterations (but ALWAYS within the SAME "varieties" of the SAME "kinds").

Consider each God-created "kind" of lifeform created within the six Days of Creation Week as a self-executable zipfile with all the different potential manifestations already ingrained in each.

"Mutations" are GENERALLY and SIGNIFICANTLY more HARMFUL than helpful -- so MUCH so that lifeforms CAN NEVER cross into different "kinds." And [thankfully] most "mutations" are NOT passed on to offspring by heredity.

According to that Ultimate Science Text called "Scripture," although mammals and everything else did NOT "evolve" from "primordial-goo sea slime," "animals" DID (spontaneously or otherwise, but not by any intrinsic capability nor intention of their own) ORIGINATE from INANIMATE substance called: "the ground" (according to Genesis 2:19).