Would you like to make this site your homepage? It's fast and easy...
Yes, Please make this my home page!
There is no GOD but JESUS, whose Name is CHRIST -
the Merciful and Benevolent, Master of Love and Master of Hate -
who can be PRAYED to THREE times a day, every day.
TRUMP, not Biden!
Facemasks should be worn indoors only by those non-tested who are
obviously exhibiting active or developing (asymptomatic) Covid
A LITTLE PICTORAL HISTORY OF PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP & JOE BIDEN
Reade, as detailed in a previous NPR report, has accused Biden of pinning her
against a wall in the hallway of a Capitol Hill building and penetrating her
vagina with his fingers in the spring of 1993.
The former aide, Tara Reade, who briefly worked as a staff assistant in Biden’s
Senate office, told The New York Times that in 1993, Biden pinned her to a wall
in a Senate building, reached under her clothing and penetrated her with his
Tara Reade, who was at the time serving as an aide in Biden’s senate office,
told podcast host Katie Halper that Biden kissed her and penetrated her with his
fingers without her consent. Reade said she pushed Biden off of her and he
allegedly became annoyed and said: “Come on, man! I heard you liked me."
“It was like everything shattered in that moment,” Reade told Halper in the
interview, which was posted Wednesday. “He was, like, my father’s age. He was
this champion of women’s rights in my eyes. I couldn’t believe it was happening.”
“The thing that I remember most, almost more than the assault itself, was just
being told I was nothing,” she said. “And he was right. That’s how people treated
me ... I have no platform, I am no one and to him I’m nothing.”
“If people want to know why women don’t come forward, that’s a good example of
why,” she added.
Christian Trump Presbyterian Confirmation Class:
Cadet Trump with Parents at New York Military Academy:
Trump New York Military School Graduation:
Trump grew up in Jamaica, Queens, and attended the Kew-Forest School from
kindergarten through seventh grade. At age 13, he enrolled in the New York
Military Academy, a private boarding school, after his parents discovered
that he had made frequent trips into Manhattan without their permission.
There he received a full secondary education.
At the end of school, in 1964, the future 45th President of the United
States entered the Fordham University, also located in New York, where he
studied for 2 years. Donald managed to do well, but two years later he
entered the The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
Upon graduation from Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania 1968,
Trump received a Bachelor of Science degree in economicswith specialization
Trump did not serve in the military during the Vietnam War. While in college
from 1964 to 1968, he obtained four student deferments. In 1966, he was
deemed fit for service based upon a military medical examination, and in 1968
was briefly classified as eligible to serve by a local draft board.
Thus, Trump never had to "prove that he was a real man" by murdering other
men as a soldier.
Trump College Graduation:
Former vice president Joe Biden received five student draft deferments during
the Vietnam War.
The Obama campaign released Biden's Selective Service records in 2008. Those
records show that he first received a deferment as an undergraduate at the
University of Delaware and later as a law student at Syracuse University.
After a physical exam in April 1968, Biden was given the Selective Service
classification "1-Y," which meant he could only be drafted in case of a
national emergency. An Obama campaign spokesman said Biden was "disqualified
from service because of asthma as a teenager."
Trump with his wife Ivana who bore him three children:
Trump with his wife Ivana on vacation together:
The mandatory-facemask-wearing thing is getting out of hand, and my prayer
is that the Lord Jesus Christ promptly thwarts and stops that insanity
Mandatory public facemask wearing is based upon anti-scientific,
media-and-bureaucrats-overhyped, superstitious paranoia -- business and
cop enforcement of such being anti-Scriptural oppressive tyranny, asinine
stupidity, and woeful ignorance.
Obviously, avoid letting anyone exhibiting contagious Coronacovid symptoms
sneeze or cough on you at reasonably close spacing in non-ventilated
enclosures, and sufficiently washing hands after touching contact-untraceable
doorknobs, is recommended.
Dr Fauci, in his video, plainly and succinctly stated that publicly wearing
facemasks is unnecessary (and worse). Under-mask-germs-buildup, fidgeting
with polluted fingers to adjust mask, and interference with proper breathing,
inhaling and exhaling, precludes wearing facemasks -- relating to
obviously-physically-unhealthy-thus-harmful asphyxiation, and there is no need
to elaborate upon personal medical details.
Entrance and transactions within Costco, Menards, T-Mobile, Public Storage,
etc must not have facemask-wearing requirement, but instead suggested voluntary
option . . . at least on the part of the customers.
Even ridiculous it is to demand a legalistic randomly-determined antisocial
distancing or Proximity Spacing of EXACTLY 6.00 feet and not instead 5.98, 6.02,
or whatever else whoever concocts.
Those superstitiously and anti-scientifically suspicious paranoid who needlessly
wear bandit facemasks automatically incriminate themselves as those having lethal
contagious Coronacovid which they so thoughtfully want to avoid passing on
to the maskless, caused worrysome and disruptive apprehensive anxiety by the
masked, and/or both suspiciously and antisocially incriminate the maskless
indiscriminately in baseless and proof-less presumptive probable cause that
such maskless more likely than not have fatally-contagious Coronacovid and both
irresponsibly and maliciously intend to murderously but vainly convey such
presumed terminal contagion to the facemasked who supposedly cannot be infected
with that allegedly-present-in-maskless contagion because of the facemask
barrier of the facemasked.
Coronacovid is not infectious until infectious systems first appear in
infector and/or infected. Asymptomatic is a misnomer, and no one can be
blamed for "carrying" every disease known to humanity on Earth.
Coronacovid cannot be infectiously transmitted by a potential infector
if that potential transmitter is not exhibiting ANY contagious symptoms
of Coronacovid infection.
Men vs Women
Superiority vs Inferiority Differences
NOT: "mankind" but INSTEAD: "humankind"
corrupt-son-Hunter-protecting, eucharist-denied-for-being-abortion-choice, quasi-senile
Joe Biden is into forced acceptance of reverse-pronoun and rest rooms transgenderism.
High-School Graduation-Test Final Exam
NO Windows 10! Be content with Windows 7!
One of the favorite verses sexist feminists and their heretic patsies like to cite in trying
to justify (but in fact twisting and misapplying) the inferior gender becoming pastors and
Scripture-reading lectors during Sunday morning church services within male congregations, female professors teaching men in college classrooms, female elders and deacons in church councils and mixed-gender female choir directors is: "in Christ there us neither male nor female; all are one in Christ."
Taken to the ultimate, such is choice excuse for transgender athletes, locker rooms and shower stalls.
That is (to such deviates) supposed to outweigh, override, and negate counter-Bible-passages of the Eve being Adam's helpmate (not adversarial competitive equal) of Genesis chapter 2, the females worth less than males of Leviticus 27:1-5, the not one worthy woman found among a thousand of Ecclesiastes 7:26-28, the lamenting against women rulership of Isaiah 3:12, the disasterous women combat troops of Nahum 3:12-13, the shameful for women to speak in church of First Corinthians 14:33-38, the women not allowed to teach nor have authority over men of First Timothy 2:11-15, and the husband-of-one-wife male-only-bishops-and-deacons First Timothy 3:2,12 Scripture.
But, apostate supporters claim: "Changing culture over the centuries, especially in recent modern times, has abrogated (so-called) "archaic and obsolete" BIble-verse mandates.
"Besides," they lawlessly continue, "we (thus including everyone without everyone's approval) are not justified by obeying the (moral) Law anymore, so it no longer applies to us in the no-more-works-righteousness New Covenant, (even though seemingly-yet-obligatory Law is frequently quoted in the New Testament by Jesus, Paul, Peter, and John). Law currently is merely of passing interest as to how bad and prejudicially oppressive it used to be. Now, Law is both useless and meaningless, even antichrist-like blasphemous and idolatrous if attempt is committed to bring anyone into bondage with it, to try to now misapply it to those saved only by grace in Christ not Law, regardless of whether or not they want to rebelliously disobey outmoded and illegally-discriminatory old-fashioned non-ceremonial? rules and regulations involving haircuts, tattoos, ingestion of pigs and shellfish. And, to Hell with misogynist Paul when he stated that 'his delight was in the Law of God' in Romans chapter 7."
Actually, there is no "right" to murder womb babies by abortion homicide - as there is no right to commit (not perform) any crime nor sin. There is instead choice to do such evil wickedness.
Reproduction (and "freedom" relating to such) is not involved in and has nothing to do with either childbirth nor abortion homicide. Reproduction is only involved in conception (which is the Creator's choice and something not planned but beyond the control of would-be parents involving parenthood) and pregnancy prevention items or techniques, erroneously miscalled "birth" "control".
When walking in the women's (not necessarily "ladies") clothing department store, I am inclined to, as I walk along, lift up the short skirt of a mannequin to see if it is wearing panties - but doubt that, if by doing so, I would be arrested for rape or lewd and lascivious conduct.
Most immodestly-misdressed inferior gender impose the immentality of: "You can look but you cannot touch. And you cannot even look, because if you do and I notice it, that would be impolite and obscene voyeurism."
I do not even want to hear women singers either softly and orgasmically or loudly and blatantly bellering out with sexual-innuendo lyrics in stores and restaurants. I engage in selective misogyny, being happily married to the same inferior-gender wonderwife for 25+ years.
Hence, the righteously discriminatory distinction:
Oh MY dove, in the (private) clefts of the rock, in the (secluded) covert of the cliff, let me see YOUR face, let me hear YOUR voice, because YOUR voice is sweet, and YOUR face is attractive (not that of some feminist sexist twit belligerently imposing her face and voice in irritating and annoying non-solicited sexual harassment). - Song of Solomon 2:14
We genuine Christians do not want equal rights for LGBTQ deviants, because it would force us to hire, employ, be defiled by, harassed with, and accept homoperverts and transsexuals in church operations, membership, associations, etc.
As would be the case in Heaven, we (and Christ Jesus with His holy angels) would not be happy with them, and they would not be happy with us, them being constantly ridiculed, shunned, criticized, quarantined, isolated, disdained, righteously hated, vehemently despised, and harshly corrected with a continuous and incessant barrage of Leviticus 20:13, Romans 1:18-28, and First Corinthians 6:9 and applications of all types therewith. There would be absolutely no love and no mercy whatsoever.
We turn away in disgust from their heresies and displays. Non-stop. Continuously. Without ever relenting.
Demoncrats fail to mention that the word "impeachment" in the minds of many Americans means "removal from office". Such incorrect "guilty" inference is exacerbated by the impeachment-related word "acquittal" occurring in Trump's case, in which Trump ADVISED not "pressured" Ukraine.
But the term "impeachment" followed by "acquittal" in the minds of the savvy and discerning does not imply nor infer "impeachment" in the sense of "removal" but instead mere ACCUSATION, as in any trial where the defendant is not simply not convicted nor merely pardoned (if acquitted unless the case is deemed frivolous and thrown out of court) perhaps on a Technicality, but instead did not actually do what he or she was accused of.
This understanding of "impeachment" NOT being equivalent to "removal" is enhanced by the words "impeachment TRIAL".
"Impeachment" and "Impeachment Trial" are obviously not synonymous. Thus, the legal term "impeachment" is simply the same as "removal ATTEMPT" or ACCUSATION with INTENT to REMOVE".
For the last time, Trump did NOT "pressure" Ukraine but merely ADVISED them. In stark contrast, Joe Biden certainly DID pressure Ukraine to call off the Ukrainian Prosecutor investigating Biden's criminality-corrupt Burisma son Hunter, or else - with clearly reprehensible non-jesting high-crime impeachable extortion - threatened (in cohoots with Obama) to withhold $1B in foreign aid.
The devilish network media conniving hand in hand with certain satanic in government have fleshed out another Scripturally-described shenanigan of "following the course of this world, following the prince of the power of the air, the spirit who is now working in the [children] of disobedience (Ephesians 2:2) . . . by deliberately timing the culmination of the wait-after-Xmas-to-patronize-christians Trump Impeachment Trial (and with collusion from propagandizing anti-Trump network media), to fully convince everyone to immediately remove the [purported] imminent-threat-against-America President . . . to therefore promptly follow with aggressively attending and participating in the DEMOCRAT Caucuses in Iowa, New Hampshire, and so forth - again - having successfully brainwashed
non-decided voters, [supposedly] now convinced of the purported dastardly insane criminality, corruption, and wickedness of Trump, to enthusiastically go to DEMOCRAT caucases and thus thereafter become diehard Democrats no matter even if DINO-despised but overwhelmingly-popular Bernie Sanders comes out ahead.
However, they did not expect that overwhelming pro-Trump anti-impeachment defensers would fight back so intensely that to-be-acquitted/now-acquitted-and -exonerated,Trump is now nearly a saint in the minds of non-decided voters compared to diabolically-unfair deviously-dishonest hatefully-biased House demoncrats and their political-candidates ilk.
Instead of brainwashing non-decided voters with lying and defamatory taxpayer-money-wasted propaganda to turn against Trump and his GOP, backfire is happening eventually causing many voters to vote instead in the GOP caucuses.
One of the underpinnings of demoncrat objection against the perfectly-acceptable long-standing Presidential policy perogative choice to take reasonable time to analyze time-period-limited foreign aid to fundamentalist-islamic Lenanon, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and even formerly/still-partially-corrupt? Ukraine to discern if American taxpayer funds were and are being wasted . . . is Demoncrat fear that dishonorably-discharged, stripper-impregnator/deserter, drug-addict, secretively-subversive, belligerent-creep Hunter Biden (who was quasi-"legally" funneling U.S. foreign aid funds and perhaps American military weaponry acquired from and to money-laundering Ukrainian gas company Burisma and maybe some of such to the anti-Ukraine Russian Federation and Chinese communists, in addition to pseudo-"legally" funnelling much of it into Joe Biden's campaign coffers against Federal Election Commission rules) was going to get his and his dad's American-taxpayer-money Ukrainian foreign aid fast enough to suit their proven-extortion-history-record, self-serving special interests.
Trump, in tandem with those having legitimate immunity because of national-security-based and Constitutional Executive Privilege, refused (but NOT "defied") illegitimate House-committee subpoenas - illegitimate because the full House did not vote on them, because subpoenas were not taken to Court for enforcement decisions, and because noTrump Counsel cross-examination was allowed by the
Perhaps Trump should not have specifically mentioned the Biden name associated with Ukrainian corruption in Trump's transcripted phone call to Ukrainian President Zelensky, and had Trump not done that, Romney might have voted differently on the first impeachment-attempt article. Mitt did not need to cross the crucial line, however, in expressing his objection concerning his final Trial vote on the Abuse article of impeachment attempt, but made up for it by his correct vote on the Obstruction article of attempted impeachment.
Our President calling James Comey a sleazy dirty cop should realize that the same James Comey, at crucial timing right before the 2016 Election, publicly announced re-opening criminal FBI investigation against national-security-endangering emails-goof Hillarius, thus tilting the 2016 Election in Trump's favor. The importance and effect of that public announcement by Comey must not be pooh-poohed nor marginalized. Asssuredly, demoncrats consider that announcement by Comey a dire disasterous mistake by the ridiculing-Trump Comey.
Trump's weakness is pandering not only to sexist-feminist inferior gender, but also to homogay perverts like Buttgag, both of which could conceivably undue him and his, come the Election of November 2020. The atrocity of homosexuality is not a frivolous insignificant trifle, especially in campaigning and government. Strong feelings against homosodomites can and will affect voter decisions, and not merely of genuine Christians throughout America. America in general is not ready, nor should ever be willing, to vote for a relugious male pervert who admits to having a cock-sucking, penis-in-rectum First-Lady "husband."
Too bad that Trump also advocated empowerment of inferior-gender filth with sexist and racist remarks in his patronizing/pandering-all SOTU Speech, like referring to religious agitators Marty King and Harriet Tubman. And, he did not specifically thank Jesus Christ, but only referenced "god" - whoever the Hail that can be construed to purportedly be.
Leave it up to homodeviate finaglers to purport Buttgag won Iowa when Bernie got slightly more popular votes. Homoperverts are expert at cooking books and forcing people to do what they never intended to do, do not want to do, who are not the homoeffeminate/homosodomite supporters who lying, deceitful, deceptive homoqueers claim they are.
In voters' initial candidate preference at the Iowa caucuses on Monday night, Sanders had 24.7 percent, or 42,672 votes, and Buttigieg took 21.3 percent, or 36,718 votes.
In voters' reallocated preference, Sanders had 26.5 percent, or 44,753 votes, and Buttigieg had 25 percent, or 42,235 votes in the Iowa vote.
Buttgag paid Groundbase/Shadow to screw things up on Iowa caucus night, in cohoots with Krista Davis who worked with Google for eight years as a software coding tech and was part of Hillary's 2016 campaign under the direction of Tara McGowan who worked for the Obama campaign in 2012. No wonder that Iowa comm director Mandy McClure had such a red face in her photo. Nahum 3:13 applies: "Hey, your troops are women in your midst. The gates of your land are wide open to your foes; fire has devoured your fortresses."
Pelosi ripping a copy of Trump's articles of impeachment or objection to pro-feminist pro-racist parts of his SOTU speech, during which speech she infrequently applauded and even stood at times while clapping was quite telling, as she later commented on such action done for cordial politeness in appreciation for Trump not touching her hand in erotically-titillating handshake, concordant with the the RSV rendition of Genesis 26:11 and Second Corinthians 6:17 plus the KJV translation of First Corinthians 7:1.
CRULES (Control Rules)
No Choice: Dangers of "Original Sin" Theology
FEAR of God?
A Secular Analysis of Origins
As much as possible, it behooves us, the
saints, to avoid going to people events where there realistically and honestly would be
potentially-"me-too"-accusatory, harassive and abusive walking
[female mopheadedness-and/or-naked-arms/legs/socksless-feet] pornography of live persons
imposing their immodest licentious lasciviousness on us against our holy will....unless
we get paid for it (e.g. it is part of our employment to get visually assaulted with lewd
immodesty, food for us is paid for by those compelling us to accompany them into harm's
The temptation to thereafter covertly search out and masturbatingly self-sodomize to
totally-nude, very-easily-accessible, internet porn pics and vids after being relentlessly
and thoughtlessly visually attacked with aforementioned non-ponytailed and/or
warm-weather-excused sleevesless/slacksless/socksless non-solicited random immodesty is far
too great to irresponsibly presume that once we have been unduly aroused erotically by such
vile filth "we can just take it, shrug it off, and be man enough to exercise complete sexual
self-control" waiting for God to someday in the far distant future finally satisfy us with
perhaps insufficient-by-then fulfillment (or so it is frequently and faithlessly expected).
The answer to all those who cruelly and sadistically expect such superhuman abstinence,
demanding: "simply turn away once it has suddenly and terroristically been thrust into your
face and down your throat, and besides, you can do all things in Christ who strengthens you,
having faith to move mountains" is: "Do not put the Lord to the test. Praying "do not lead
us into temptation but deliver us away from evil" requires our and particularly their
cooperation as much as we and particularly they must do our part to figuratively pluck out
the sin-causing worthless eyes of the lust-causing seducers instead of our own precious
And as to mountain-moving faith, few of us can afford the mighty backhoe and immense
bulldozer to realistically move such huge "just take it and shut up" obstacles, and simply
talking to non-mere-trifle-molehills into safe relocation makes asinine fools of ourselves
when such diabolically-indecent massive mountains are in fact not moved whatsoever.
God requires women to be dressed completely and consistently decent in mixed-gender
general-public view per First Timothy 2:9, and if they do not, they are to blame for not
walking in love, causing their vulnerable neighbors to stumble, which does no one any good,
especially themselves who simply get shunned and castigated for their obtrusive immodesty
immentality actions with no satisfying sensual gratification for themselves ever obtained.
The question is: "WHICH Decent-and-Well-Rounded, Practical and Realistic,
Public Sex Ed is Better for an Impressionable Kid?"
To audibly read the restrictive-but-honorably-promising RSV's, NASB's, ESV's,
NRSV's Numbers 5, Leviticus 18, II Samuel 13, Proverbs 5-7, Song of Solomon 1-8, Isaiah 20 and 47, Jeremiah 2,
Ezekiel 16 and 23, Hosea 2, Nahum 3, First Corinthians 6 and 7.
OR instead to get into . . .
available-to-all-of-any-age, reputationally-non-inconvenient, disposable-with-impunity,
immediately-and-safely-gratifying, non-discriminatory, no-"me-too" non-accusatory, non-repressive and non-prudish,
non-violent, non-abusive, lovingly-and-considerately non-inhibited, non-sadistically-non-frigid and non-deprivatory,
tender, affectionate, beautiful and totally-(not-partially)-nude, oral-on-genital-foreplay porn websites on the internet
(which will not be named not for the sake of not exposing devices-of-Satan works of darkness but to not let licentious
immorality nor indecent impurity be even suggested among us)
Who is God?
Original Sin Nature?
Cateresy: Atonement by Ingesting Eucharist?
NO woman should orate in a pulpit nor at a lecturn
near the altar in any Christian church, Islamic mosque, or Jewish synagogue
within a congregation containing men, per First Corinthians 14:33-38 and First Timothy 2:11-14.
Also, NO child 12 and under (noisy or not) should be allowed entrance into any religious-worship sanctuary
per Job 6:24 & 13:5, Psalm 62:1, Proverbs 22:15, Ecclesiastes 3:7, Isaiah 3:12 & 47:5, Habakkuk 2:20,
Zephaniah 1:7 and Zechariah 2:13
Which to Wear: hijab, niqab, chador, or burka?
Men To Rule in Church!
Three Heresies Refuted
Law to Save?
Dress to Caress
Pa - NOT Ma!
Sacrifice for Sin?
High School Graduation Final Exam
Zilch the Torysteller 1
Zilch the Torysteller 2
Zilch the Torysteller 3
P and S #1
P and S #2
Credibility of Common Sense Science
Hitler's Speech (English captions)
Hitler's Speech (French captions)
Other Hitler Speeches
The Glory of the Cross
Louis Vierne - Messe solennelle en do# mineur - Kyrie
Pilgrim's Hymn (Stephen Paulus)
He Who Shall Endure to the End (Mendelssohn)
Alleluia (Randall Thompson)
Salvation is Created (Pavel Tchesnokov)
Oasis (Maynard Ferguson)
Eiger Sanction (John Williams)
Breath of Stillness (Sacred
Flos Campi (Flower of the Field, R W Williams)
Dirait on "Les Chansons des Roses" - Morten Lauridsen
Julian Bream | Recuerdos de la Alhambra, Francisco Tárrega
David Russell (Recuerdos de la Alhambra, Francisco Tárrega
Recuerdos de la Alhambra, Cordoba Series Torres Model
Gary Clark Jr. - 12 Bar Blues-Jam @Jam'in'Berlin
Gary Clark Jr. & Junkie XL - Come Together (Justice League)
Louis Vierne Toccata, B flat minor (Peter Bengtson, Organ)
Vierne Toccata B-Moll (Bernhard Hirzberger)
Vincent Dubois - Louis Vierne - Toccata Op. 53 No. 6
Ode to Joy (9th Symphony - Beethoven)
Gloria (Missa Solemnis - Beethoven)
Hoedown (Aaron Copland)
Concrete and Steel (ZZ Top)
Foreigner - "Urgent"
Common Sense Science Hotlinks
The Big Three:
Clean Air and Climate Change
Modest Christian Dress Code
Excluding Govt-Imposed Pro-Homo/Pro-Abort Pagan-Religion Non-Discrimination Statutes
for Churches, Synagogues, & Mosques
Without providing the redemptive Jesus Christ as benevolent "Contingency Plan" against
God deliberately imposing the Tempter in the Garden of Eden,
His creation would NOT have been "good" as it states in Genesis chapter one.
Not for All
Scott Walker Sets Anti-Protestors Pro-Economy-Improvements Plan for Trump
Can jews better themselves by themselves alone . . .
or do they always or sometimes need help from gentile Christians?
Jealous and legalistic jews (taking the practice of animal-blood-sacrifice-for-atonement
to the extreme by murdering Jewish Jesus, by command-to-others bodily assault or by cowardly desertion
. . . though some of them later repented of that and became ardent devout Christians)
were to blame for Christ's death on a cross . . .
Jesus Himself was to blame for suicidally letting them pseudo--"legally" murder
(NOT "execute") Him -- when He easily could have prevented all that from occurring.
Hotlink to Some Old-Tyme,
Junior-Hymnal-Numbered, Evangelical-Lutheran/Baptist, Hymn Titles for Simple Guitar Strumming
in the Keys of G and D only
Q: "Should a politician end his speech with the quasi-meaningless buzzphrase: "God bless
which - by default - includes solicitation for God's blessing on feminist-sexist
twits, homosexual effeminate and sodomites,
anti-creationist/pseudo-scientific evolutionists, pervert pornographers and their indecent
womb-babe-murdering abortionists and their so-called "victim" accomplices,antisemites against Israeli
all of whom are currently infesting the territory known as the United States?
A: No. They instead should declare: "America, praise God through Jesus Christ!"
Is "liberal" episcopalian Gorsuch a wolf in sheep's clothing?
After the 49-year-old Gorsuch was nominated to replace late Justice Antonin Scalia on Jan. 31,
scores of evangelical and pro-life leaders called the nomination a fulfillment of Trump's
promise to nominate an originalist, pro-life conservative justice in the mold of Scalia,
saying that he has an unwavering judicial philosophy of interpreting the U.S. Constitution
as originally written.
Many praised the fact that Gorsuch sided in favor of religious liberties in high-profile
cases such as Hobby Lobby and Little Sisters of the Poor and even dissented in a 2016 ruling
favoring Planned Parenthood.
However, multiple reports have pointed out that Gorsuch and his wife attend St. John's, Boulder
— a liberal Episcopal church headed by a very liberal, pro-LGBT female rector named "rev"
Susan Springer [ the title of "rev" in quotation marks is because First Timothy 3 verses 2
and 12 allows only monogamous MALES (that is: "the husband of one wife") to be in ecclesiastical
authority in the Church ]
Opposition to Gorsuch's affiliation with St. John's was voiced even before he was nominated.
Christian conservative activist and lawyer Andy Schlafly, the son of the late pro-life leader
Phyllis Schlafly, voiced his concern over the possible nomination of Gorsuch in an email sent
in November with the subject line: "veto these Sup. Ct. nominee candidates."
Schlafly wrote that Gorsuch "probably would NOT be pro-life on the Supreme Court" and included
him on his list of "unacceptable nominees."
"Gorsuch's Episcopalian church has declared its 'unequivocal opposition' to pro-life laws and
he has said nothing publicly pro-life," Schlafly wrote in the email.
Others, including journalist Julia Duin, who previously wrote for the conservative news outlet
The Washington Times, have brought up the issue of Gorsuch's membership at St. John's.
"Think about that for a moment. If this man is the frightening conservative that some on the
Left are already alleging him to be, there's no way he'd be Episcopalian, much less at a
woman-priested church," Duin wrote. "The Episcopal Church, for anyone who's not been following
religion trends in recent decades, has been careening to the theological and cultural left for
years and its membership statistics show it. Thousands have left TEC and joined alternative
"A Google search shows there's an Anglican church in Boulder that the Gorsuch family could be
attending if they so desired," she continued. "So, the fact that the judge and his family has
remained at St. John's says something."
It behooves Donald Trump to publicly declare that women should not rule over men in
economics nor in the business world, per obvious contemporary application of First Timothy
2:8-15 among several other similar passages in both the Old Testament and New Testament
[ e.g. Leviticus 27:1-5, Numbers chapter 30, Ecclesiastes 7:26-28, Nahum 3:13, KJV's First
Corinthians 11:1-16 and 14:33-38, First Peter 3:7 ]
Slap Back (Turn The Other Cheek)
Old-and-New-Testament English Bible Translations Comparison
A Catholic Audience Political Speech
A 2016 Election Analysis
JAMES WHITBOURN - REQUIEM CANTICORUM
M.Haydn: Requiem in do minore (1771)
Michael Haydn - Requiem - Ensemble & Choir Pygmalion
LUDWIK MAADER - REQUIEM
Theodore Gouvy Requiem
ALEXANDER SACHETYNSKY - REQUIEM
Alexander Shchetynsky- Requiem for mixed chorus
Vieri Tosatti - Requiem (1963)
GEORGE LLOYD REQUIEM
Richard Wetz "Requiem op 50"
Giuseppe Geremia Requiem
Antonin Rejcha Requiem
Alfred Desenclos Requiem
Giovanni Simone Mayr - Grande messa da requiem in G-minor (1815)
Eybler 1803 Requiem Helbich
Ildebrando Pizzetti: Messa di Requiem (1922/1923)
JOHN HERBERT FOULDS - A WORLD REQUIEM
Lux in Tenebris, Luminosity by James Whitbourn
Giuseppe Geremia Requiem
J Guy Ropartz Requiem
Jehan Alain Requiem
Gorli 1990 Requiem
BARTOLOMEO CORDANS REQUIEM
Vicente Goicoetxea Requiem
Zelenka 1737 Requiem
Jan Dismas Zelenka-Requiem in C minor
REQUIEM Frigyes Hidas
JAMES T BINGHAM - REQUIEM
Bach - Passacaglia/Fugue in c minor, BWV 582 (T. Koopman)
Oöphoi - Unbearable Sadness of Memories
Shamanic Tibetan Meditation
Shanti Mantra, Vedic Mysticism, Pandit Jasraj
Shri Anantaha Morning Hindu Chant
Karma Shanti Mantra
1 HORA DE MANTRA OM ~ AUM ~OM
Chinese Zen Music: Guzheng & Erhu music
Yoga Music with Glockspiel Bells
Bach 2-Part Preludes and Fugues [ fingering by Icorigin ]
Bach 3-Part Preludes and Fugues [ fingering by Icorigin ]
Hotlinks to YouTube Classical, Jazz, and Rock Music
What is the Supreme Law of the Land? What is the Most Important Document Ever Written?
The SPECIFICALLY-ANTI-CHRISTIAN phrase: separation of CHURCH and state
is a bigoted and biased misnomer.
The United States Constitution?
No, it is The Old-and-New-Testaments Christian Holy Bible.
The 19th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution stating that: "The right of citizens of the United
States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of
sex" should be REPEALED, because of semantical error.
What makes it deserving repeal is mis-worded inclusion of the WRONG term: SEX.
"Sex" might OR might NOT be related to GENDER, but in fact is properly meant to refer to CONNECTION
and/or MANIPULATION of various human body parts by a living human being for EROTIC gratification -
WHATEVER the gender.
To wit, "sex" can be EITHER homosexual or heterosexual (REGARDLESS of gender), and thus pertain to
a male human with a male human, a female human with a female human, a male human with a female
human, a female human with a male human, or either gender sensually connected with some living OR
non-living object (thus involving self-sodomizing MASTURBATION)...but GENDER ONLY pertains to who
or what the Bible describes as being EITHER "male" or "female."
It is the MALENESS or FEMALENESS of a life form which involves GENDER - NOT "sex."
It behooves the inquisitive desiring elaboration to ponder what exactly is meant by "male" or
"female" pertaining to human beings.
Concordant with Christian Scripture, a gender-by-birth FEMALE human is one who:
(1) typically menstruates, beginning in their teen years and ceasing to do so usually
before age 60. Male humans do NOT and NEVER menstruate as to emitting blood from a vagina relating
to female reproductive organs.
(2) has their origin not from dust of the earth, but rather from a rib which God the Creator
formed into a sentient-being woman WHO (NOT "which") then possessed awareness of morality and an
(3) has their entire genetic DNA structure comprised of XX instead of XY chromosomes
throughout their entire body
(4) was born with reproductive internal Fallopian tubes, uterus, and ovaries, plus a "pussy"
comprised of genitalia (vulva, vagina, etc.) usually surrounded (beginning in their teen years) by
attractive non-shaved public hair.
(5) can and frequently do become pregnant with child (not merely "fetus"), whereas male
humans never have, do not now, and never will become pregnant nor birth children out of a vagina.
[ Job 11:12 = A stupid person will get understanding, when a wild donkey's colt is born a
human being. ]
(6) is physically, mentally, emotionally, and spiritually inferior to male humans, thus
relegated to being subservient to and ruled by male humans (refer to Genesis chapter 3, Leviticus
27:1-5, Numbers 5 and 30, Ecclesiastes 7:26-28, Isaiah 3:12, Nahum 3:13, First Corinthians 11:1-16
and 14:33-38, First Timothy 2:8-15, and First Peter 3:7).
The above-cited Bible verses are the cause why women should at least be discouraged from voting
in government-related elections and at most be forbidden to so vote, because voting in
government-related elections is obviously becoming and being part of the government, of which
those of the female gender should NOT be leaders over men. That most certainly includes Hillary
The infamous transvestite (and perhaps genitally-altered transsexual) Bruce Jenner, who was male
at birth, must not be called a "her" nor a "she" ("legally" or otherwise) because of the points
stated above -- even though he artificially and effeminately has caused his appearance to display
certain and in-some-ways-inappropriate characteristics of a feminine nature (e.g. loose long hair,
enlarged breasts?, women's clothing, and so on).
There have been heretical mis-attempts to Scripturally justify the selection
and appointment of the inferior-gender, weaker-sex [woman] Hillary Clinton as candidate for
President of the United States.
Certain false-religion, feminist-sexist-supportive-and-misminded subversives have mis-applied the
stories of Deborah and Esther in the Old Testament, plus the virgin Mary, Anna, Mary Magdalene,
Joanna, Susanna, Mary of Clopas, Dorcas, etc. in the New Testament, to allegedly mean that the
Lord's will and intention for Hillary Clinton is to become the most powerful person in United
That, of course, non-conditionally contradicts (no matter what the doctrines-of-demons excuses and
irrationalizations) such non-deniable and most-certainly applicable Bible references as:
Genesis 3:16 = To the woman he said, "I will greatly multiply your pain in childbearing; in
pain you shall bring forth children, yet your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall
rule over you."
[So The precedent for all present and future authority pertaining to gender is thereby set]
Leviticus 27:5 = If the person is from five years old up to twenty years old, your
valuation shall be for a male twenty shekels, and for a female ten shekels.
Leviticus 27:6 = If the person is from a month old up to five years old, your valuation
shall be for a male five shekels of silver, and for a female your valuation shall be three shekels
Leviticus 27:7 = And if the person is sixty years old and upward, then your valuation for
a male shall be fifteen shekels, and for a female ten shekels.
[Though those instructions are given to those within the Old-Testament Hebrew theocracy, of which
Moses the male was the human equivalent of a prime minister or president or king,
such also apply to other forms of government, such as a parliamentary republic, monarchy,
democracy, fascism, nazism, communism, socialism, totalitarianism - whether or not there is
"separation of church and state" and whether or not the things of Caesar ultimately belong to God
or instead belong only to Caesar]
Ecclesiastes 7:27 = Hey, this is what I found, says the Preacher, adding one thing to
another to find the sum,
Ecclesiastes 7:28 = which my mind has sought repeatedly, but I have not found. One
man among a thousand I found, but a woman among all these I have not
[Which of the twelve apostles of Christ Jesus were women? Which books of
the entire 66-book HOLY BIBLE were written by women? Which woman is now pictured
on a $1, $5, $10, $20, $50, $100, $1,000 or $10,000 dollar bill? Which of the Founding Fathers
were women? Which of Hitler's top henchmen were women? Which of the Roman
emperors were women? Did Bloody Mary do anyone any good to the daffy brits who drive on
the wrong side of the road and pervertedly wear shortened-skirted hairy-legs-baring kilts (see
Ecclesiastes 10:2 RSV and Luke 8:27)? Did Golda Meir un-confuse the Israelis and eradicate the
Song of Solomon2:14 = Oh my dove, in the clefts of the rock, in the covert of the cliff,
let me see your face, let me hear your voice, for
your voice is sweet, and your face is attractive.
[Men like Solomon do not want to be sexually harassed nor erotically aroused by seeing the
arrogant impudent face of some not-married-to-themselves sexist woman newscaster, anchor, cop,
judge, nor politician flapping her irritatingly chauvinistic jaws from the hole beneath her
Isaiah 3:12 My people: children are their oppressors, and women rule over
them. Oh my people, your leaders mislead you, and confuse the course of your paths.
[Isaiah here was not limiting his lament to "those inside the church" but rather to most every
citizen of his country and nation as a whole. Clearly he was neither advocating that bratty
shrieking selfish children should noise-harass others with childish mischief in public, nor
advocating that sexually-harassing women be allowed in charge as government officials to
exercise authority over men]
Nahum 3:13 = Hey, your troops are women among you. The gates of your
land are wide open to your foes; fire has devoured your fortresses.
[The above reference clearly does not merely apply only "to those in the church." Whoever
heard of armed military combat soldiers being restricted to being "in the church?"]
First Corinthians 11:3 = But I want you to understand that the head of every man is
Christ, the head of a woman is her husband, and the head of Christ is God.
[Notice that the term every [man]. The term is NOT limited to merely those
inside "the church," - whatever "the church" means]
First Corinthians 14:34 = The women should keep silence in the churches,
because they are not allowed to speak, but should be subordinate, as
even the law says..
["as even THE LAW says"]
Galatians 3:28 = There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there
is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus.
That verse is, among many others, is one which (as Saint Peter states in Second Peter 3:16)
deviates and heretics twist to their own destruction, and have been used by false prophets in
sheep's clothing to infer that women are supposedly equal to and with men in not only ability
but positional competition.
Though Scripture verses do not contradict each other, many are paradoxical with each other,
and must be rightly interpreted by spiritual men who truly have the Spirit.
A few other Bible verses would initially and humanly seem impossible and even ridiculous
without spiritual discretion and understanding. For example, when Solomon stated in
Ecclesiastes 11:7 that "it is pleasant for the eyes to behold the sun," such is true
(unless one stares into it for several hours and goes blind); when Saint Paul stated
in Colossians 3:3 that "you have died," when was your date of death recorded by the County
or State Licensed Medical Examiner, what casket where you reposing within, where the funeral
home where your lifeless corpse temporarily was, and where is the graveyard your body in
casket was buried in? He also stated in Philippians 4:13 that "I can do all things in Christ
who strengthens me" (including jumping over the Moon without a rocket or out of a high-flying
commercial jet without a parachute over farmland and not expect to be crushed upon impact)?
Even the Bible itself obviously and frequently differentiates plain distinctions between Jew
and Greek, slave and free, male and female in many other verses of Scripture.
The "one in Christ Jesus" only and obviously applies to certain attributes and circumstances,
such as all humans have souls and moral responsibilities and unity of mind (though not of one
actual physical body) in Christ Jesus. It does NOT imply equality in terms of patriarchal
authority pertaining to non-identical male and female gender]
First Timothy 2:12 = I allow NO woman to teach or to have authority over men; she is
to keep silent.
First Timothy 2:14 = and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became
[What part of "NO" woman might we not understand, the "N" or the "O?" Note the reference to
the primal ancestors of all humanity (i.e. Adam and Eve) are alluded to, going way
beyond the limited scope of "those in the church."
Again, keep in mind that we are not restricting nor quarantining ourselves with
any "separation of church and state" presumptions, legally or not, regardless of pussy-wimps
who purport that "our kingdom is not of this world," and thus we should retreat out of it and
hide, unlike Saint Paul who intimately interacted with Roman soldiers and government, as did
First Peter 3:7 = Likewise you husbands, live considerately with your wives, bestowing
honor on the woman as the weaker gender, being that you are joint heirs of the grace of life,
in order that your prayers may not be hindered.
When King Ahasuerus told Esther that he would grant her only "UP TO half of his kingdom,"
Persian law did not mandate that she would rule over the people therein, but merely have
ownership and perhaps some aspects of caretakership of the property. Ahasuerus, of course,
retained 50% possession, and being the one who promised could at any time be one who could
un-promise and could depose her at any time as he did against Queen Vashti for feminist-sexist
insubordination or whatever.
Judges chapter 4 tells of a judge Deborah who [supposedly] "ruled" but only as an
advisor or consultant in a certain sense because pussy-wimp Barack
would not go to war without her......and God allowed such, even though obviously it was not
His stated intention and will for woman-temporarily-in-leadership to occur; nor war hero
Jephthah to murder his own daughter (see Judges chapter 11) which is something even Abraham
came close to doing against his only son Isaac; nor His will for Samson to consort with the
harlot of Gaza plus Delilah and have his eyes put out; nor His will for David to commit
adultery and conspiracy to murder concerning Bathsheba.
The significantly-good GOP platform stances that Sarah Palin and Carly Fiorina have,
compared to pro-choice/pro-abortion and pro-homopervert democrat-platform platitudes
associated with Hillary Clinton, does not abrogate anti-women-in-charge-of-the-nation
Scripture verses cited above.
Even though Palin and Fiorina might or might not contribute to the cause of good with their
questionable feminist activism or partial immodesty so far, they (and obviously not
body-baggage-laden, national-security-endangering, private-email-server-goof, bitchwitch
Hillary Clinton) are Scripturally not qualified to be our national VP nor
Presidential leader and Commander-in-Chief.
Ephesians 5:23 For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the
church, his body, and is himself its Savior.
[Ah, here "the church" is indeed mentioned, but Christ is not only the head of the church,
but instead King of kings and Lord of lords. Such King and Lord is also overall head of
women, and therefore His patriarchal and males-in-government-authority charge is likewise
in effect over them]
Those pseudo(?)-"christians" who (like Peter lying about himself never going to deny the
Lord, and then actually denying Christ to make it worse) have as their pro-Clinton
objective fear of satanic humanity and NOT fear of God within themselves, causing
them to try to [anti-Scripturally] set up a purported "prophetess" in government authority
because of the wicked spirit of feminist sexism infesting them.
What about separation of SYNAGOGUE and state? How about separation of MOSQUE and state?
The anti-Biblical subversive intention actually meant by the misnomer phrase: separation of
CHURCH and state is: separation of RELIGION and state.
And that ILLEGALLY and UNLAWFULLY flies squarely in the face of the two RELIGION clauses of the
First Amendment of the United States Constitution, which state that "Congress shall make no
law establishing RELIGION, nor prohibiting the free exercise of RELIGION.
Sorry, subversives and supporters within "Freedom From Religion Foundation" of Madison
Wisconsin...but you all are being anti-Constitutional from the start!
Evolutionists do NOT have "faith." They instead exhibit: presumptive bias.
There is NO such thing as "microevolution" (in supposed contrast to "macroevolution").
Why that is is that "microevolution" is simply a more GRADUAL type of [alleged] evolution
(with a NON-existent-but-should-have-been-AMPLE supply of NEVER-YET-found "transitional"
species or kinds).
Neither "kinds" nor "varieties" within "kinds" have ever existed
nor can exist PARTLY-assembled, whether over long or short time periods. ALL crucial
(though not "critical") parts HAVE to be PERFECTLY functioning at the SAME time
(like car parts in an adequately-working automobile) or the organism-to-be would never
become life-supportive nor live long enough to reproduce.
There are many "kinds" (as the Bible terms them) and NONE of them reproduce into different
"kinds", but all reproduced and yet reproduce "after their own kind" according to Genesis
chapter one on an Earth initially covered completely with WATER (and not "lava")
which Earth was in existence FOUR Creation Days BEFORE the Sun, Moon, and stars were
"A stupid man will get understanding, when a wild donkey's colt is born a man"
There are obviously "varieties" within various "kinds" (such as birds, reptiles, insects,
fish, vegetation, mammals, and so on as described in First Corinthians 15:39).
[ There is ONLY one "kind" of human being - whatever the skin color, eye-fold shape,
and other bodily characteristics. All functional humans of whatever so-called "race" or
blood type can reproduce with each other. ]
And within each of those "varieties" within "kinds" of lifeforms, ADAPTATION has and does
occur because of reproductive combinations, environmental stimuli, etc. producing SLIGHT
alterations (but ALWAYS within the SAME "varieties" of the SAME "kinds").
Consider each God-created "kind" of lifeform created within the six Days of Creation Week
as a self-executable zipfile with all the different potential manifestations already
ingrained in each.
"Mutations" are GENERALLY and SIGNIFICANTLY more HARMFUL than helpful -- so MUCH so that
lifeforms CAN NEVER cross into different "kinds." And [thankfully] most "mutations" are
NOT passed on to offspring by heredity.
According to that Ultimate Science Text called "Scripture," although mammals and everything
else did NOT "evolve" from "primordial-goo sea slime," "animals" DID (spontaneously or
otherwise, but not by any intrinsic capability nor intention of their own) ORIGINATE from
INANIMATE substance called: "the ground" (according to Genesis 2:19).