Government Must Not Prohibit Christian Religion While Not Establishing Pagan Religion

An Extended Application of the Separation of Religion from State


Tony Perkins of the godly FRC organization recently pointed out (with reference to Donald Trump recently signing a somewhat-inadequate Religious Freedom Act) that government establishment of the Pagan Religion of same-gender homosodomy-unions licensing [mis-called: "gay" "marriage"] must not be imposed by any IRS or other government-agency non-exclusion or non-discrimination statutes or law against Christian-Religion holy doctrines of not merely "Church" relating to "State" but [and to elaborate further upon what Perkins did not specifically add] also no government intrusion contrary against similar morality doctrines of Synagogue (associated with the Jewish Religion) nor similar morality doctrines of Mosque (associated with the Islam Religion).

The same non-entanglement by State (or Government) must not be legally mandated as [illegal] discrimination concerning (not "regarding") the Pagan Religion of Wiccan or Satanic occultism, stinking up surrounding vicinity with public-nuisance repulsive perfumes and/or noxious cigarette smoke, anti-public-safety highway drunkenness, committing non-reproductive and anti-healthful abortion-homicide manslaughter against innocent womb babies, pseudo-"educational" non-"scholastic" anti-creationist brainwashing concerning the heresy of [anti-true-science] evolutionary propaganda, visually assaulting eyesight with the defiling and insane licentiousness and lasciviousness of anti-hijab/anti-burka publicly-mopheaded/naked-armed-sleevesless/nude-legged-slacksless/sandal-footed-socksless public immodesty [characteristic of many modern women now infesting America, especially during warmer weather], profanely uttering the expletory "f-word" in public for impatient or hostile deprecation, exhibiting bigoted anti-Israel antisemitism, and particularly the arrogant and activist promoting of anti-patriarchal sexist feminism with all its deplorable insidious manifestations.

The Founding Fathers - if one does extensive-enough historical research regarding their application of the Establishment/Prohibition Clauses of the First Amendment - determined what to them was "unacceptable" Religion (with associated religious practices) versus what to them was "acceptable" Religion (with associated religious practices) by a Judeo-Christian Holy-Bible-based Standard . . . instead of the revisionist-misworded perverse Religious "standard" of and by those spewing advocacy for "tolerance-and-equality-for-all-except-Christians" homogays and atheists, pro-choice-for-infanticide/anti-choice-against-childbirth womb-babe abusers, anti-creationist-while-pro-evolution-mythology nutjobs, public-immodesty-instead-of-puritannical-modesty slut/whore-lookalikes, etc.

One of the pet (positive-and-not-negative) Bible verses misinterpreted and mis-applied (out of context) by everyone-will-go-to-Heaven universal-inclusionists is:

John 3:16 = "God so loved the world that he gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have eternal life,
John 3:17 = because God sent the Son into the world, not to condemn the world, but that the world might be saved through Him.

Similar inclusionist verses are:

First Timothy 2:3 = This is good, and it is acceptable in the sight of God our Savior,
First Timothy 2:4 who desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth.

First Timothy 4:10 = To this end we labor and strive, because we have our hope set on the living God, who is the Savior of all men, especially of those who believe.

Second Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slow about His promise as some [misconsider] "slowness," but is patient toward you, not wishing/wanting/willing ["wanting" to me is best] that any should perish, but that all should reach repentance.

So, for "all men" (i.e. actually: HUMANS of both genders, according to the root Greek-Text word: anthropos found all throughout the New Testament of the Judeo-Christian Holy Bible) to ACTUALLY be saved and end up in Heaven instead of Hell, "repentance" is involved.

That should be obvious, in that the fixed and non-alterable absolute morality in Heaven and among all therein would not be appreciated nor voluntarily participated in by those whose bottom-line intention is rebellion, defiance, and disobedience against non-compromising and total Biblical righteousness, and so they would not even be allowed entrance into nor residence within Eternal Glory with the Lord and his Religious-Right Perfectly-Holy Saints.

And we are not talking about besieged-by-non-asked-for-duress carnal Christians, involuntarily tempted by non-asked-for erotic and other temptations causing them to lamentably and occasionally or even frequently stumble into immodest or quasi-immoral sinning . . . but instead those who intrinsically - of themselves and by themselves - willfully and persistently, deliberately ignore, disregard, are irritated by, balk against, revile, inwardly despise, and essentially hate God's moral Law, and actually like to rebelliously and repetitiously disobey, underneath it all.

Romans 7:22 = I delight in the Law of God, in my inmost self . . .
Satan 7:22 = I despise the Law of God, in my inmost self . . .

Nothing about the Gospel in the verses above. Not yet. First things first. If they do not have nor go along with desire to perfectly obey the Law 24/7 and be totally and completely submitted to the absolute authority of God the Creator in all of their lives and lifestyle, there is no sense nor cause for them to even hear about or listen to, relate to, accept, nor apply to themselves the redemptive Gospel of Jesus Christ involving remission of sins with sin obviously defined (of necessity) by particulars of the Law of God (and not humanly-concocted, legalistic, off-the-wall substitutes - such as crusading for inclusive diversity for and tolerance involving homoqueers and related transsexuals and transgenders and transvestites, demanding sexist "equality", mis-calling evolution heresy: "science" and porn: "art" and abortion: "choice" or "reproductive freedom" and claiming legality of [homopervert] human "rights" and gay "rights" and chauvinistic women's "rights" and abortion "rights" and so on).

[ NOTE: Perhaps-non-admittedly partnering with the 7:22 Satanic-verse rendition above are "Oh, I - with perpetually-ingrained sinful nature - cannot merit salvation myself by accepting the Gospel, because I am not saved by doing any of my own good works or being righteous myself as to obeying the Law, because the Father-condemned Christ obeyed it for me so the Law does not apply to me anymore being that I now live by and am saved by grace through faith and thus can live like the Devil and still get away with it because the blood of Jesus has and continues to cleanse me from all accidental sinful oopsies and anti-self-esteem guilt and I am content being dressed in His righteousness alone while I am indecently and immodestly mis-dressed in the sight of sexually-harassed-by-my-own-self-centered-conceit victimized and visually-abused men not married to me nor ever intending to marry me" apostates ]

If ALL students (of ALL religions including irreligious atheists and agnostics) in public schools (including immodestly-misdressed-and/or-heretic-doctrines-espousing pseudo-"christians" along with maryolatrous/purgatorial/apocryphal/pope-is-perfect/Mary-was-sinlessly-immaculate catholics plus kill-Christians-kill-Jews-per-Koranic-demand islamic) are ALREADY saved by the "Savior of all men" (i.e. humans of both genders) according to First Timothy 4:10, WHY would God "our" Savior (and the word: "our" can indiscriminately be uttered by ANYBODY) desire those "to be" saved according to First Timothy 2:3?

And WHAT has the "repentance" of Second Peter 3:9 have to do with those "already saved" by "the Savior of all persons especially those who believe" [whatever that latter phrase means]?

"Repentance" from or concerning WHAT (pertaining to public-school students of all religions)?

And there is the semantical problem with the so-called "legal" name of the Freedom FROM Religion Foundation of Madison Wisconsin.

I could understand a name like: Freedom OF Religion Foundation or Freedom WITH Religion Foundation or Freedom FOR Religion Foundation . . . but the word FROM sounds a lot like Freedom AGAINST Religion Foundation which automatically makes it illegal as a registered name, being that it clearly violates the Non-Establishment/Non-Prohibition Clauses of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the words thereof specifically referring to "religion" which obviously is thus addressed and allowed constitutionally.

May our Lord Jesus Christ commission ISIS to behead such as soon as possible.

The same mis-terminology applies to Planned PARENTHOOD, operatives of which do NOT plan NOR cause God-given conception timing, but do terminate conceptions and pregnancies [not with "birth" "control" but instead with pregnancy-preventer [NOT "birth"-"control"] pills and whatever] and facilitating abortion homicide [which is neither "reproductive" nor promote a mother's and womb-child's "health"] . . . besides abusing women with pushy and bruising mammograms.

So, "Planned Parent-Whatever" is here for EVIL, and not "for good."

First Timothy 2:8 I desire [as does the Holy Spirit who inspired me!] that in every place the men should pray, lifting holy hands without anger or quarreling;
9 also that women should adorn themselves modestly and properly in decent apparel, not with plaited hair or gold or pearls or costly clothing
10 but by good works, as befits women who profess religion.
11 Have a woman learn in silence with all subjection.
12 I allow NO woman to teach or to have authority over men; she is to keep silent,
13 because Adam was formed first, then Eve;
14 and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor.
15 Yet woman will be saved by bearing children, if she continues in faith and love and holiness, with sensibility.

First Timothy 5:14 [KJV] I would have younger women [NOT: "widows"] marry, bear children, manage their households, and give the enemy no cause to revile us,
First Timothy 5:15 because some have already strayed after Satan.

Thus, so-called "planned parenthood" MUST be legally re-named: "Planned Parentlessness" - the demonic crusade of such being frequently based upon: "Planned Promiscuity" characteristic of X-to-XXX immoral who do not take parental responsibility for illicitly screwing each other sexually and then incurring "inconvenient" or "embarrassing" or "financially-non-supportable" pregnancies with CHILD instead of mere "fetus."

What kind of "religious freedom" in public schools do you want?

Do you mind the kill-Christians/kill-Jews/decapitate-"infidels" Qur'an reading to your impressionable Christian children in public school? How about the irrationalizing meaderings of some off-an-a-tangent rambling rabbi pontificating in the Talmud? Want your kids to reverently pray, while bowed down prostate on all fours, to "benevolent"/"all-merciful" 70-nude-virgins-for-suicide-bombers-promising "allah"? How about the animalistic "the great spirit" of american indians? Or sit in yoga-trance stupor in front of a buddha statue? Maybe pander to dirty disease-bearing flies on India's "sacred" cows? Be brainwashed by some frightening hocus-pocus voodoo witch doctor or trapped within a wiccan-witch bloody-human-sacrifice black mass?

School girls publicly wearing a very-modest hijab or burka instead of sexually-harassing and seducing males-at-large in bikinis is one thing, but the other stuff along with it? Why not direct children to the modest habit-costumes of old-order Catholic nuns, or the Amish?

Most legal entities agree that carrying and both privately and silently reading a Judeo-Christian Holy Bible, or Torah, or acceptable parts of a Qur'an, plus privately and quietly praying or praying amongst a like-minded group of consensual Christians, or Jews, or even seemingly-peaceable Muslims -- in public schools at appropriate times -- is not unlawful nor illegal.

Even REASONABLE (and non-harassive) proselytizing among such students with other students (or students with teachers and even authority-figure teachers with students) as to discreetly or cautiously advertising their Religion to others of a different or no Religion in particular . . . might be OK (depending upon veracity of religious-text subject matter) -- within the parameters of school scheduling, policies, and regulation and in accord with civil-law standards enforced by police or sheriff and courts.

But any objections reasonably expressed, even one time or once, by the solicited to the religious solicitor should (if possible) be honored and accommodated to so the solicitor does not become guilty of illegal invasion of privacy, causing mental anguish, disturbing the peace, stalking, harassing, or bullying.

At the same time, the majority rules, and if the majority has no problem with a Christian Bible being read to them, any minority-number objectors should be free to excuse themselves from hearing what they disdain being (or to be) read to them -- but no one should be allowed to violate legislated laws of the school or American government in general around them, especially if then when such laws at least might have been or yet are based upon or in accord with the Christian Bible and/or Torah (part of the Christian Bible, incidentally).

The non-Christian-theocracy U.S. Constitution - ultimately - is fatally flawed concerning whatever type of religion is non-established and whatever brand of religion is non-prohibited, and obviously those who fervently espouse whatever brand or kind of Religion are devoutly determined to not establish and not prohibit their favorite one. Such, of course, goes way beyond mere distinctions and differences of denominations or sectarian varieties within whatever religions.

Clearly, from an intensive reading of or compared to an intensive reading of the totality of the leading [KJV/RSV/NASB/NKJV/more] translations of the Sacred-66-books Judeo-Christian [i.e. Old-and-New-Testaments] Holy Bible, it is plain and blatantly evident that the two texts of the religion of Islam and the religion of Christianity are not only fundamentally different as to life-vs-death intentions, but in vital aspects are even in doctrinal and precise-moralistic conflict incompatible with, and in direct non-resolvable opposition to, each other.

"COEXIST" is not and never possible pertaining to the two religions -- both as to the stubborn and fanatical socially-hostile and suicidally self-destructive mindset of muslims in allegiance with and to the Qur'an.....and in the opposite but even more non-yielding and to-the-death Biblically-accommodating thoughts and Scripturally-legitimate actions of genuine orthodox Christians.

Being that the type and kind of "religion" is not specified in the First Amendment clauses, it is up to various convincing and persuasive voices and opinions of both those of and in whatever partisan government exercising authority, along with American-terroritory-inhabiting citizens and aliens (both legal and illegal) of whatever mental proclivities, to determine which of the two contrary-to-each-other-in-vital-ways religions is, is to become, and becomes, predominant over the other -- to whatever extents, at whatever times, in whatever ways...and such is constantly in flux.

Where is the Almighty Power, the real Creator God, the Eternal Supreme-Being Builder of the Universe and all therein, in all of this -- watching all His human creatures scurry around like confused and divisively-quarreling multi-directional ants amused and pleased and angered by the metaphorical or symbolical equivalent of some huge Divine Elephant in the heavens?

"He" (and sorry, you remarkably-absurd transgenderists, He has male-gender designation and NOT female identification, according to texts and dogma of major world religions) is indeed watching all things happening below, and intervenes however and whenever, and to whatever extent, concordant with His own free-willed decisions (and not as planned parentlessness chooses).

While we on the subject of Government Separation from not simply "Church" both also "Synagogue" and even "Mosque" pertaining to the irreconcilabity of the perversion of same-gender homosodomy-unions licensings versus heterosexuality-only real marriages (recalling other deviances of Pagan Religion previously mentioned . . . in stark contrast to the opposite morality-mandates of Christianity, Judaism, and Islam), there just might be some devoutly-religious islamic or muslims who are intrigued or perplexed as to exactly and precisely what I consider wrong, incorrect, aberrant, or even heretic or apostate about their beliefs -- especially regarding what is so similar or maybe even identical morality with authentic-Christian Religion.

They are those who I lovingly and tenderly want to enlighten, being that I find their very-honorably-modest hijab-and-burka-attired females so appreciated....compared to lurid-and-lwed, disgusting and despicable mopheaded and/or naked-armed sleevesless and/or nude-legged slacksless (or shortened-skirted) and/or soxless-in-sandals "american" women freely and impudently roaming around who are sexually harassing hapless male victims by their silently-indecent, senseless and wastefully-futile, non-solicited incitement for-perhaps-non-admitted but certainly-non-wanted equivalence-of-adultery (inciting to other-person prostitution with expensive escorts and/or masseuses [or at least self-sodomizing masturbation with nude-female-pics porn] quite willing and ready to be woefully-substitutional quasi-sexual-relief sex objects for the sadistically tantalized, then - logically and consequentially - erotically desperate).

Yours truly also abhors the bumper-sticker slogan: COEXIST - with lettering comprised of a crescent, Star of David, Christian cross, and so on.


Is not there ONE God, when it comes right down to it - a Creator God who can be called by different names for different persons speaking foreign languages in diverse cultures?

Yes, there IS ONLY ONE Creator God (in fact), but it is ABSOLUTELY VITAL that His name be IDENTIFIED with who He Himself has revealed to humans regarding HIS true and sufficiently-known ACTUAL characteristics and intentions for all His human creatures.

Notice that I have cogently quoted specific-Biblical passages above - not simply my own opinion among many.

It is my RIGHT, not merely my CAPACITY, to publicly quote specific and pertinent passages from the Hebrew/Jewish Christian Bible - NOT the Qur'an or Koran nor Egyptian Book of the Dead nor Communist Manifesto nor Mein Kampf nor Declaration of Independence nor Bill of Rights nor United States Constitution.

WHY did I do it?

Because I CAN.

And WHY did I do what I can?

Because I WANTED to do what I CAN.

I simply wanted to do what I can.

End of line. Summary judgment. No more questioning. What more in addition could be said? That's all, and that's it. The end answer for everything.

Each people group in sundry countries of the world on the planet have their own name for God (e.g. the Germans have theirs, the Russians theirs, the Chinese theirs, the Scandinavian theirs, the Africans theirs, the Israelis theirs, the British and Canadians and Americans theirs, the Spanish and Mexicans theirs, and so forth).

So why can't Arabs, as well as Jews, have theirs?

Arabs and Jews have an origin and purpose that goes beyond ethic varieties and beyond geographical locations or indigenous languages they were born into and fluently utilize.

That origin and purpose belong to the realm of Religion, and involve exactly who that Creator God designated as which of the two (e.g. Jew or Arab) was to become and be His chief spokesmen revealing His intentions to humanity.

"Allah" is said, by islamic muslims, to be "all-merciful" and "benevolent."

Is THAT ALL that the Sacred-66-books Judeo-Christian (Old-and-New-Testaments) Holy Bible says about God, His characteristics, His desires and intentions for us humans?

Pseudo-"christian" evangelical apostates claim that they are "justified" by "grace" through "faith" and not by doing "works of Law." and thus infer that they can (and even maybe should) live like the Devil, and so what? "We've been baptized and saved, so what's the big-deal need about tearfully repenting for a few partially-regretted naughty-naughty oopsies?"

We genuine and authentic Christian DO want to know ALL that pleases the Lord......and even ALL that displeases Him.

Enter: The Law. Hello? We need to know exactly all of what "sin" is and what to do about it. It is impossible to define or apply "the gospel" without The Law. Repentance is vital for real and authentic salvation.

But repent for WHAT? Not finding an AIDS cure for intolerant and hatefully-impenitent homosexuals? Inspecting and licensing mom-and-babe-mangling abortuaries so they are more healthful? Call it "reproductive choice" to non-reproductively murder human womb babes? Save ice caps for polar bears by not breathing out CO2 and driving horses not cars....while God's solar flares make the Arctic and Antarctic packs melt? Do floating ice cubes (being that the molecular lattice of ice expands when water freezes) in a glass of water REALLY raise the water level when they melt?

Only the Lord can plan pregnancy, not "planned parenthood." All potential parents can do is provide whatever God-given resources in the right time and place and methods.

But why not preoccupy onesself with expensive and time-consuming dogs or cats as pets?

Romans 9:29 And as Isaiah predicted: "If the Lord of hosts had not left us children [NOT pets], we would have fared like Sodom and been made like Gomorrah."

First Timothy 2:11 Have a woman learn in silence with all submissiveness.
12 I allow NO woman to teach or to have authority over men; she is to keep silent. [not only in fundamentalist Iran and other Middle-East countries]
13 For Adam was formed first, then Eve; [yes, the Creator-Account history is no myth!]
14 and Adam was not deceived, but the [inferior-not-equal-gender] woman was deceived and became a transgressor.
15 Yet woman will be saved by bearing children [NOT pets!], if she continues in faith and love and holiness, with sobriety.

First Timothy 5:14 So I would have younger WOMEN marry, bear children [NOT pets], manage their households, and give the enemy no cause to revile us,
First Timothy 5:15 being that some have already strayed after Satan.

Providing pregnancy preventors misnamed "birth" "control?" Substituting the word "choice" for "intention to commit and not "perform" infanticide?" Mis-calling evolution "science" and pornography "art?"

Mis-naming same-GENDER-homo-SODOMY-unions-licensing "same-SEX" "MARRIAGE?" There is NOT even ONE instance of any homosexuals married to each other in the entire Genesis-to-Revelation Bible.

TRUE marriage, by default, involves male and female gender distinction.

May men never be allowed by federal or state civil-and-equal-rites nutcases to claim transgenderism and then invade some woman's toilet stall when she is sitting with her pants down on the throne, or blithely trot into some woman's locker room while females are showering nude.

Our bodily safety and non-extinction survival depends upon it - not merely in this life but in what we know and not simply suspect [per Biblical info] is The Eternal Afterlife.

Not only should every man cover his pole, but every woman should cover her hole, when in general public view.


It should be obvious (according to the Jewish Old-and-New-Testaments Christian Holy Bible) that God, or at least His Voice - probably audibly - spoke to Adam and Eve, to Noah (my beloved great-ancestor, without whose ark-building expertise I would not now be writing to you), to Abraham and Isaac and Jacob and ruler-of-Egypt Joseph, and - somewhat last but not least - Moses the Law-giver who authored the Pentateuch and Torah therein and thereof.

Here's the problem:

The name "allah" signifies and represents a naming of Deity which by subtle or overt implication is disassociated away from the Jews -- specifically away from the Divinely-appointed source Isaac (not the ousted-by-Sarah-and-Abraham father-of-Arabs Ishmael, expelled because of his mocking Isaac):

Genesis 21:9 And Sarah saw the son of Hagar the Egyptian, whom she had borne to Abraham, mocking.
Genesis 21:10 Therefore she said to Abraham: "Throw out this bondwoman and her son; for the son of this bondwoman shall not be heir with my son, even with Isaac."
Genesis 21:11 And the thing was very grievous in Abraham's sight because of his son.
Genesis 21:12 And God said to Abraham: "Let it not be grievous in your sight because of the boy, and because of your [previously-copulated-with] bondwoman. In all that Sarah has said to you, go along with her demand, because in Isaac shall your seed be called.

The lineage of Ishmael (mostly-arab Hamas and Hizbollah and other misnamed-"palestinian" anti-Zionists) have been "mocking" the lineage of Isaac (Israeli jews and Christian Jews in Israel) ever since.

That disassociation away from the Jews by use of the term "allah" notoriously involves a disassociation away from the complete revelation of all God's intentions and will (comprised of a plethora of commands of various aspects of morality and lifestyles) which was FIRST given more-or-less exclusively to Hebrews, or Jews ("Jews" designated as offspring of Jacob/Israel), then to others like Melchizedek, Balaam, Joseph's Pharaoh, Ruth the Moabitess, Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon, Darius the Mede, Cyrus the Persian, etc.

Mohammed, who lived approximately 500 years after the birth of Jesus Christ, certainly had oral and probably written access to already-written-and-canonized Old and New Testament Scripture texts, and being the perhaps-somewhat-disreputable character of sexual deviancy and violence he is said to have been (rumor has it that he committed various mass murders against those who he deemed his enemies, among sexually-oriented quirks), he plagiarized parts of true Scripture into his own rewritten mixed-up-prose revisionism (containing threats of genocide against Jews and Christians!) which we now know as The Qur'an (or Koran).....

....a demonic substitute against The Real Thing, and itself a conglomeration of at least deficient axioms of vague morality and at worse bloody satanic verses.

Such is, of course, in direct conflict and opposition against the following, spoken by Master-Jew Jesus and master-Jew Paul:

John 4:22 You worship what you do not know; we worship what we know, for salvation is from the Jews.

Romans 3:1 Then what advantage has the Jew? Or what is the value of circumcision?
Romans 3:2 Much in every way. To begin with, the Jews are entrusted with the oracles of God.

Romans 11:28 As regards the gospel they are enemies of God, for your sake; but as regards election they are beloved for the sake of their forefathers.

So take heart, God-fearing Arab descendants of Ishmael and Esau, being that the definition of "Jew" goes WAY beyond blood-lineage to not simply Abraham, but also Isaac and Jacob:

Genesis 17:20 As for Ishmael, I have heard you; hey, I will bless him and make him fruitful and multiply him abundantly; he shall be the father of twelve princes, and I will make him a great nation.
Genesis 21:18 Get up, lift up the lad [Ishmael], and hold him fast with your hand; for I will make him a great nation." [and so we have mega-Arabs in Iran, Iraq, Yemen, Kuwait, Jordan, Lebanon, Gaza, Saudi Arabia, England, the U.S. and much more]

Isaiah 10:22 Though your people Israel be as the sand of the sea, only a remnant of them will return. Destruction is decreed, overflowing with righteousness.

Luke 3:8 Bear fruits that befit repentance, and do not begin to say to yourselves: 'We have Abraham as our father'; for I tell you, God is able from these stones to raise up children to Abraham.

Romans 2:28 He is not a real Jew who is one outwardly, nor is true circumcision something external and physical.
Romans 2:29 He is a Jew who is one inwardly, and real circumcision is a matter of the heart, spiritual and not literal. His praise is not from men but from God.

Romans 9:6 But it is not as though the word of God had failed. For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel...

Romans 9:27 And Isaiah proclaims concerning [not "regarding"] Israel: "Though the number of the sons of Israel be as the sand of the sea, only a remnant of them will be saved..."

First John 2:22 Who is the liar but he/she who denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is an antichrist, he [or she] who denies the Father and the Son.

Revelation 2:9 "I know your tribulation and your poverty (but you are rich) and the slander of those who say that they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan."

Revelation 3:9 "Hey, I will make those of the synagogue of Satan who say that they are Jews and are not, but lie....hey, I will make them come and bow down before your feet, and learn that I have loved you."

Notice that I quoted passages above from the Hebrew/Jewish Christian Bible - NOT the Qur'an or Koran nor Egyptian Book of the Dead nor Communist Manifesto nor Mein Kampf nor Declaration of Independence nor Bill of Rights nor United States Constitution, etc.

It is my RIGHT, not merely my CAPACITY, to so do.

Such SPECIFIC and DETAILED clarification is certainly NOT found ANYWHERE in the Qur'an (or Koran), and is one cause why the Qur'an or Koran is NOT to be depended upon for supreme authoritative nor complete revelation of God's actual will and words for us, His human beings who HE owns.

All this is NOT a question nor problem of "prejudice" or "bigotry" or "bias" against islamic or muslims, frequently and fraudulently misrepresented as: "islamophobia" (i.e. fear of or hatred against islamic/muslims) nor "misogyny" (i.e. causeless hatred against all women).

Similarly, the hate-love-mixture patience with and condemnation against Jesus-as-Messiah-rejecting Jews is not to be misconstrued as "antisemitism" -- nor is aversion against abortion homicide, homo-effeminate and/or homo-sodomy homosexuality, evolution-heresy mythology, anti-patriarchal feminist sexism, etc. by orthodox messianic Jews to be misconstrued as "antisemitism."

Can "allah"-petitioning arabs, or whoever utters apostate and infidel "allah"/koranic nonsense, be saved and get into the REAL Heaven - populated with the Triune Creator God of Father, Son, Holy Spirit and other heavenly beings with redeemed and glorified saints?

Yes, but conditionally.

Can Jesus-as-Messiah-rejecting jews or whoever stubbornly and prejudicially mouths disbelief against Christian dogma be saved and get into the REAL Heaven - populated with the Triune Creator God of Father, Son, Holy Spirit, with other heavenly beings and redeemed saints such as Adam and Even, Enoch, Noah, Abraham and Isaac and Jacob, Moses, Gideon, Samuel, Jonathan, David, Solomon, the prophets, the apostles, and many others?

Of course, but conditionally.

And what is that condition?

To accept all religions as equal, all names of God devoid of singular and exclusive association with the God of the Hebrews, to try to self-righteously justify oneself with a pitiful assortment of "I'm good" or "I'm OK" or "I'm only human and no worse than anybody else" questionable-motivation good works amidst an overwhelming accumulation of evil works?

Or to accept the Jewish Source of Real Truth as THE True Bible and Scriptural Text, and THE correctly-named God and Lord identified therein, along with the associated-by-necessity complete revelation of ALL that He [not "she"] wants and intends for us to obey and do, plus believe in and profess the doctrines of the atonement-for-sins-by-Jesus gospel by the Law-loving-and-abiding whose intention is to perfectly accommodate 24/7 to God's will in The Spirit....despite the duress of all types of tempters surrounding and confronting them?


Relating to sexually-oriented issues of anti-creationist/anti-Creator-incepted-morality, heretic/apostate evolution (mythology), public immodesty (especially of human females and during warm weather), pornography (of all kinds) and (consequential) self-sodomizing masturbational abuse, fornication or adultery, (non-reproductive/anti-healthy) abortion-choice-(not-rights) womb-baby infanticide, anti-patriarchal feminist sexism (not "equality"), homotransgenderism and homo-effeminate (not "gay") homosodomy and licensings of such (not "gay" "marriage")...are not heterosexual enticements, encounters, and connections (of various types) a DEAD END -- IF the underlying motivation is not OFFSPRING REPRODUCTION?